HomeAll NewsEducationTV
Equities & FundsCrypto & Digital AssetsAI & TechnologyBusiness & CorporateUS Politics & PolicyGeopolitics & Global RiskMacro, Rates & FXCommodities & EnergyEuropean Politics & MarketsAsia-PacificReal Estate & Property
Story archiveAll categories
← All Stories

Judge Rules Trump Administration Illegally Blocked Energy Grants to Blue States

Created at 24 Jul · 6:16 PM1 source↑ Market-relevant
IN SHORT

A federal judge ruled the Trump administration illegally canceled $7.6 billion in clean energy grants for projects in states that voted for Kamala Harris in the 2024 election. The judge found the administration's actions violated the Constitution's equal protection requirements by targeting states based on their electoral support for Trump.

✉Newsletter

PiQ Daily

Pick your topics. Get only what matters, on your cadence.

Key Numbers

$7.6 billioncanceled clean energy grants
16 statesaffected by grant cancellations
315 grantsterminated in October
223 projectssupport ended for
$7.5 billionworth of projects affected

Who's Involved

Trump administration
canceled clean energy grants based on election results
U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta
ruled administration's actions violated Constitution's equal protection
Kamala Harris
received votes in states targeted for grant cancellations
Russell Vought
White House budget director who bragged about canceling grants
Department of Energy
stated officials disagree with the judge's decision
Judge Rules Trump Administration Illegally Blocked Energy Grants to Blue States

↳ Why This Matters

The ruling establishes a legal precedent that government funding decisions cannot be based on political affiliation or electoral support, reinforcing the principle of equal protection under the law.

Key facts

  • A federal judge ruled the Trump administration illegally canceled $7.6 billion in clean energy grants.
  • The grants were for projects in states that voted for Kamala Harris in the 2024 election.
  • The judge found the administration's actions violated the Constitution's equal protection requirements.
  • The administration admitted to making grant termination decisions based on states' electoral support for Trump.
  • The Energy Department stated officials disagree with the judge's decision.

A federal judge ruled Monday that the Trump administration acted illegally when it canceled $7.6 billion in clean energy grants for projects in states that voted for Democrat Kamala Harris in the 2024 election. U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta stated the administration’s action violated the Constitution’s equal protection requirements.

Mehta wrote in his opinion that the administration freely admitted to making grant termination decisions primarily, if not exclusively, based on whether the awardee resided in a state whose citizens voted for President Trump in 2024. The judge found that the administration offered no explanation for how their purposeful targeting of grant recipients based on their electoral support for Trump—or lack of it—rationally advances their stated government interest.

The grants supported hundreds of clean energy projects in 16 states, including battery plants, hydrogen technology projects, upgrades to the electric grid, and efforts to capture carbon dioxide emissions. The Energy Department had stated the projects were terminated after a review determined they did not adequately advance the nation’s energy needs or were not economically viable. Russell Vought, the White House budget director, had posted on social media that "the Left’s climate agenda is being canceled."

This ruling was the second legal setback for the administration’s rollback of clean energy programs. In total, 315 grants were terminated in October, ending support for 223 projects worth approximately $7.5 billion. All but one of the awardees were based in states where Donald Trump lost the majority vote to Kamala Harris in 2024. A spokesman for the Energy Department said officials disagree with the judge’s decision on clean energy grants.

Frequently asked questions

The administration canceled approximately $7.6 billion in clean energy grants, affecting 223 projects.

The grants were canceled for projects in states that voted for Kamala Harris in the 2024 election, with all but one awardee based in such states.

U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta found that the administration's actions violated the Constitution's equal protection clause by making funding decisions based on states' electoral support for President Trump.

A spokesman for the Energy Department stated that officials disagree with the judge's decision.

What Happens Next

01The Energy Department may appeal the judge's decision.

Get the newsletter.

Pick the topics you actually care about. We'll email when there's news worth your time, on the cadence you choose. Cancel any time from your account.

Cadence

How It Developed

Federal officials halted billions in funding for energy projects to states based on their 2024 election support for President Trump.
A federal judge ruled the Trump administration illegally canceled $7.6 billion in clean energy grants for projects in states that voted for Kamala Harris in the 2024 election.
The grants supported hundreds of clean energy projects in 16 states, including battery plants and hydrogen technology.
The Energy Department stated projects were terminated after a review found they did not adequately advance national energy needs or were not economically viable.
U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta stated the administration's actions violated the Constitution's equal protection requirements.
Mehta wrote that the administration freely admitted to making grant-termination decisions primarily, if not exclusively, based on whether awardees resided in states that voted for Trump.
The judge found the administration offered no explanation for how targeting grant recipients based on electoral support rationally advances stated government interests.
The ruling was the second legal setback for the administration's rollback of clean energy programs.
Sponsored

London Quick Take - 22 July - UK inflation softens, oil rises and chips rally ahead of Alphabet, Tesla earnings

SAXO

Sources

T1
Trump Administration Admits Canceling Grants to States That Did Not Vote for HimThe New York Times
T2
Court: Administration illegally blocked grants to Democratic states ...apnews.com
T2
Judge: Trump violated Fifth Amendment by ending energy grants in only ...arstechnica.com

Related Stories

Trump administration drive to seize election powers sparking ‘chaos’ despite pushback
24 Jul · 11:06 AM
Rivian sues US government for refund of Trump-era tariffs
24 Jul · 3:31 PM
Trump administration rejects UN farm declaration over gender references
24 Jul · 3:41 PM
Judge rebuffs Trump admin demand for phone records from NYT reporters
24 Jul · 6:06 PM
Trump Administration Urges Congress to Make Daylight Saving Time Permanent
23 Jul · 6:47 PM