HomeEverythingEducationTV
Equities & FundsCrypto & Digital AssetsAI & TechnologyBusiness & CorporateUS Politics & PolicyGeopolitics & Global RiskMacro, Rates & FXCommodities & EnergyEuropean Politics & MarketsAsia-PacificReal Estate & Property
Story archiveAll categories
← All Stories

Hillsborough Law poised for final passage amid security service dispute

Created at 14 Jul · 5:56 AM1 source↑ Market-relevant
IN SHORT

A law criminalizing public bodies and officials who lie to the public, championed by Labour, is nearing final parliamentary approval. The bill faced significant opposition over its application to security services, a point of contention that nearly derailed its passage.

✉Newsletter

PiQ Daily

Pick your topics. Get only what matters, on your cadence.

Key Numbers

97victims of the Hillsborough disaster
30years David Conn has reported on Hillsborough
2016year of the second inquest into Hillsborough deaths
2021year of the death of the 97th victim, Andrew Devine
2017year Andy Burnham first proposed a law in this vein
2024year Labour was elected
349Labour MPs backing Andy Burnham
2009year of the 20th-anniversary memorial service at Anfield

Who's Involved

Keir Starmer
Prime Minister expected to push the Hillsborough Law through its final stages
David Conn
Journalist who has reported on Hillsborough for 30 years and was interviewed about the families' final battle
Andy Burnham
Advocate of the Hillsborough Law and soon-to-be Prime Minister
Margaret Aspinal
Mother of Hillsborough victim James Aspinal, who spoke at conference to introduce Starmer
David Duckenfield
Match commander found not guilty of gross negligence manslaughter

↳ Why This Matters

This law represents a significant shift in accountability for public bodies and officials in the UK, aiming to prevent future cover-ups and ensure greater transparency in public inquiries. Its passage is a hard-won victory for victims' families and a key legislative achievement for the current government.

Key facts

  • A new law criminalizing public bodies and officials who lie to the British public is expected to pass its final stages in the Commons.
  • The law aims to introduce a duty of candour for public officials and provide equality of funding for legal representation for those fighting for justice.
  • The bill faced significant opposition regarding its application to security services, leading to its withdrawal by the government.
  • Campaigners argued that exemptions for security services would undermine the law's core purpose.
  • The Manchester Arena inquiry highlighted MI5's submission of inaccurate intelligence, bolstering the argument for including security services in the law.

A landmark law, often referred to as the Hillsborough Law, is on the cusp of final parliamentary approval in the UK. This legislation aims to criminalize public bodies and officials who lie to the public and to provide equal funding for legal representation to those fighting for justice against authorities. The law, a long-standing commitment of the Labour Party, has been a decade-long campaign for the families of the 97 victims of the 1989 Hillsborough disaster.

The journey to this point has been fraught with challenges. Initially proposed as a private member's bill in 2017 by Andy Burnham, it gained momentum after Labour's election victory in 2024. However, progress stalled due to a significant dispute over whether the law should apply to security services. The government's attempt to carve out exemptions for these agencies led to the bill being pulled midway through its parliamentary passage, causing considerable anger among the Hillsborough families.

Campaigners, including the families of the Manchester Arena bombing victims, argued vehemently against exemptions for security services, citing instances like MI5's submission of inaccurate intelligence in the Manchester Arena inquiry. They insisted that including security services was crucial to the law's purpose of ensuring candour and accountability. Reports suggest that a resolution has been reached, with decisions on excluding evidence on national security grounds now resting with inquiry chairs, a compromise apparently accepted by the families.

The impending passage of the law is seen as a significant achievement for the Hillsborough families and a key legacy for Keir Starmer in his final week as Prime Minister. The role of Andy Burnham, a long-time supporter of the Hillsborough cause, is also highlighted, particularly his efforts following the 20th-anniversary memorial service that led to the Hillsborough Independent Panel's report, which exposed police cover-ups and led to the quashing of the original accidental death verdict.

Frequently asked questions

The Hillsborough Law is legislation designed to criminalize public bodies and officials who lie to the public and to ensure equality of funding for legal representation for individuals fighting for justice against authorities.

The primary controversy centered on whether the law should apply to security services, with the government initially seeking exemptions that campaigners argued would undermine the bill's purpose.

The law has been championed by the Labour Party, with significant advocacy from figures like Andy Burnham and support from the families of the Hillsborough disaster victims.

The 1989 FA Cup semi-final at Hillsborough stadium resulted in a lethal crush that killed 97 people, with subsequent inquests finding they were unlawfully killed due to gross negligence manslaughter by match commander David Duckenfield.

What Happens Next

01The bill is expected to complete its final stages in the Commons today.
02The law will be enacted following parliamentary approval.

Get the newsletter.

Pick the topics you actually care about. We'll email when there's news worth your time, on the cadence you choose. Cancel any time from your account.

Cadence

How It Developed

A law criminalizing public bodies and officials who lie to the public is expected to complete its final stages in the Commons.
The Hillsborough law, championed by Labour since opposition, faced resistance over its application to security services.
The government pulled the bill due to a dispute over security service exemptions.
Campaigners argued that allowing security services to avoid scrutiny undermined the law's purpose.
MI5 was found to have submitted inaccurate intelligence in the Manchester Arena inquiry.
The final sticking point regarding national security evidence exclusion has been resolved.
The bill's passage is seen as significant in Keir Starmer's final week as prime minister and ahead of Andy Burnham becoming prime minister.

Sources

T1
Tuesday briefing: The law that Hillsborough built – and the bitter final battle to get it throughThe Guardian

Related Stories

Ex-top civil servant Olly Robbins sues PM Starmer over sacking
13 Jul · 2:46 PM
US Congress faces pressure over Turkey's F-35 program return
13 Jul · 12:41 PM
Chinook crash families fight MoD over inquiry call
13 Jul · 10:31 AM
GOP leaders scramble to unjam House as time runs short
13 Jul · 8:51 AM
Senator Warren Presses JP Morgan CEO Dimon on Epstein Lobbying Claims
13 Jul · 9:36 AM