Key facts
- Florida's lawsuit against OpenAI over ChatGPT's alleged harms to children has moved to federal court.
- Judge Aileen Cannon has been assigned to the case.
- The lawsuit claims OpenAI engages in unfair business practices by not warning about ChatGPT's dangers.
- OpenAI has stated it has industry-leading protections for children.
- Judge Cannon's previous rulings in the classified documents case against Donald Trump drew criticism.
Florida's lawsuit against OpenAI, alleging that its ChatGPT chatbot poses risks to children and is responsible for various harms, has been transferred to federal court and assigned to Judge Aileen Cannon. This development adds intrigue to the high-profile legal battle, which intersects with President Donald Trump's interests as OpenAI pursues an investment from the federal government and the administration advances its AI regulatory agenda.
OpenAI recently proposed offering the Trump administration a 5 percent stake in the company. While Cannon has the discretion to decline jurisdiction, and Florida's Attorney General James Uthmeier could oppose the transfer, no such actions have been taken. The state's lawsuit argues that OpenAI engages in unfair business practices by failing to warn users about ChatGPT's dangers and by offering a product with unsuitable content for children without adequate age verification. Florida is seeking court orders for reforms, including parental consent for data collection from younger users, in addition to monetary damages.
OpenAI has countered these allegations by asserting that the company has implemented robust protections for children. Judge Cannon, appointed in 2020, has previously faced criticism for her rulings in the classified documents case involving Donald Trump, including blocking the release of an investigative report concerning Trump's handling of classified materials.