All NewsEducationTV
Equities & FundsCrypto & Digital AssetsAI & TechnologyBusiness & CorporateUS Politics & PolicyGeopolitics & Global RiskMacro, Rates & FXCommodities & EnergyEuropean Politics & MarketsAsia-PacificReal Estate & Property
Story archiveAll categories
← All Stories

Flock surveillance cameras pose crash risk, US safety advocates claim

Created at 30 Jul · 12:12 PM1 source↑ Market-relevant
IN SHORT

Safety advocates are raising concerns that Flock Safety's automated license plate reader cameras, often painted black and lacking breakaway features, pose a significant roadside hazard to drivers in the US. These cameras are frequently installed too close to travel lanes, violating federal guidelines and increasing the risk of severe injury or fatality in a crash.

✉Newsletter

PiQ Daily

Pick your topics. Get only what matters, on your cadence.

Key Numbers

80,000 to 100,000estimated Flock cameras deployed in the US
6,000+communities with Flock cameras
26%vehicle deaths in 2024 attributed to fixed barrier crashes
8 feetminimum distance from travel lane for ALPRs on uncurbed facilities in Ohio
2 feetdistance from asphalt road edge for some Flock cameras

Who's Involved

Flock Safety
Company providing automated license plate reader cameras
Steve Eimers
Safety advocate known as the 'Guardrail Guy', documenting camera hazards
National Safety Council
Non-profit reporting on vehicle death statistics
Federal Highway Administration
Agency establishing standards for roadside safety hardware
Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT)
State authority on roadside installation requirements
Beavercreek Police Department
Flock Safety customer cited for camera installation
Paris Lewbel
Flock Safety spokesperson

↳ Why This Matters

The placement and design of surveillance cameras on public roads could be contributing to vehicle accidents and fatalities, highlighting a potential conflict between public safety surveillance goals and road safety engineering standards.

Key facts

  • Flock Safety cameras, used for automated license plate reading, are being criticized by safety advocates for posing potential roadside crash risks.
  • Many cameras are painted black, making them difficult to see, and are installed on metal rods without breakaway plates, a safety feature designed to reduce impact in collisions.
  • Advocates point to instances where cameras are placed closer to travel lanes than federal guidelines recommend, increasing the danger for drivers who leave the road.
  • Flock Safety asserts that it adheres to all state and local requirements for camera installations and that customers determine camera locations based on public safety priorities.
  • Despite safety concerns, police departments and Flock Safety highlight the cameras' effectiveness in crime reduction, including recovering stolen property and locating missing persons.

Safety advocates are raising concerns about the physical placement and design of Flock Safety's automated license plate reader (ALPR) cameras, arguing they pose a significant crash risk to drivers. These cameras, often painted black and difficult to see, are frequently installed on metal rods lacking breakaway features, which are designed to mitigate impact in vehicle collisions. Advocates, including Steve Eimers, who lost his daughter in a crash involving a roadside structure, have documented numerous installations that violate federal guidelines, such as being placed too close to travel lanes. The Federal Highway Administration mandates that roadside sign supports in clear zones be breakaway, yielding, or shielded. However, Eimers states that most Flock poles lack the required breakaway plates, and even when present, they are often positioned too high. While Flock Safety and police departments maintain that the cameras are effective crime reduction tools and that installations follow all applicable requirements, safety advocates argue that these structures are not adequately inspected for compliance with roadside safety standards. The company states that customers determine camera locations and that it works with them to meet requirements, planning a review of its camera pole installations.

Frequently asked questions

An ALPR is a camera system that records license plate details, along with vehicle make, model, color, and other features. Flock Safety uses these cameras for surveillance and crime reduction.

Advocates claim the cameras are often installed on non-breakaway metal poles, painted black for concealment, and placed too close to travel lanes, violating safety standards and increasing the danger if a vehicle collides with them.

Federal guidelines require roadside structures in clear zones to be breakaway, yielding, or shielded by barriers to minimize harm to motorists who leave the roadway.

Flock Safety states it follows all state and local requirements and that customers determine camera locations based on public safety priorities. The company plans to review its installations.

What Happens Next

01Flock Safety plans to review camera pole installations across its network.

Get the newsletter.

Pick the topics you actually care about. We'll email when there's news worth your time, on the cadence you choose. Cancel any time from your account.

Cadence

How It Developed

Safety advocates claim Flock Safety cameras pose roadside hazards.
Cameras are often black, difficult to see, and lack breakaway features.
Installation locations frequently violate federal guidelines for clear zones.
Flock Safety states it follows all local and state requirements.
Police departments using Flock cameras state they are effective crime reduction tools.

Sources

T1
Flock surveillance cameras can pose a crash risk for drivers, US experts sayThe Guardian

Related Stories

Massie Plans Bill to Cut Federal Funds for Flock Cameras
29 Jul · 8:51 PM
US transportation chief defunds bike lanes, citing DEI, sparking safety concerns
30 Jul · 12:12 PM
UK reviews police ceding criminal cases to US military
30 Jul · 5:12 AM
Trump DOJ charged hundreds with assaulting officers; many cases dropped
30 Jul · 10:07 AM
Democrat asks Musk for xAI data center environmental impact details
29 Jul · 4:24 PM