All NewsEducationTV
Equities & FundsCrypto & Digital AssetsAI & TechnologyBusiness & CorporateUS Politics & PolicyGeopolitics & Global RiskMacro, Rates & FXCommodities & EnergyEuropean Politics & MarketsAsia-PacificReal Estate & Property
Story archiveAll categories
← All Stories

Flock Planned Nationwide Plate-Scanning Fleet Using Uber, Lyft Cars

Created at 7 Aug · 7:26 PM1 source↑ Market-relevant
IN SHORT

Flock Safety proposed a plan to partner with Nexar to use dashcams in approximately 350,000 Uber, Lyft, and delivery vehicles to scan license plates nationwide. The company stated the deal was never executed, and it is unclear if drivers or ride-sharing apps were aware of the proposal. This plan emerged as Flock faces scrutiny over privacy concerns and potential civil liberties violations.

✉Newsletter

PiQ Daily

Pick your topics. Get only what matters, on your cadence.

Key Numbers

350,000Uber, Lyft, and delivery cars targeted for plate scanning
5,000U.S. communities covered by Flock's stationary cameras
24Cases of alleged officer abuse of Flock's system

Who's Involved

Flock Safety
Law enforcement technology vendor proposing nationwide plate-scanning fleet
Nexar
Company whose dashcams were intended for Flock's plate-scanning plan
Uber
Ride-sharing company whose drivers were part of Flock's proposed plan
Lyft
Ride-sharing company whose drivers were part of Flock's proposed plan
LAPD
Police department that did not renew its contract with Flock
EPIC
Non-profit advocacy group urging a ban on automatic license-plate readers
Thomas Massie
U.S. Representative planning to sponsor a bill withholding federal funds for Flock-style cameras
Flock Planned Nationwide Plate-Scanning Fleet Using Uber, Lyft Cars

↳ Why This Matters

The proposed expansion highlights the aggressive growth ambitions of Flock Safety in the automated license-plate recognition market, raising significant concerns about widespread surveillance, privacy violations, and potential misuse of data by law enforcement. The company's plans underscore the ongoing debate and regulatory efforts to balance public safety with civil liberties in the face of adva

Key facts

  • Flock Safety proposed a plan to utilize dashcams from Nexar, installed in approximately 350,000 Uber, Lyft, and delivery vehicles, to scan license plates.
  • The company claims this partnership with Nexar was never executed.
  • Flock's standard product involves fixed cameras that record passing vehicles' license plates, make, and model.
  • The proposed expansion aimed to create a real-time, region-wide license plate tracking system using civilian vehicles.
  • Flock faces increasing scrutiny, including the LAPD's decision not to renew its contract due to privacy concerns.
  • Legal challenges and legislative actions are targeting automated license-plate recognition (ALPR) technology.

Flock Safety, a controversial vendor for law enforcement technology, had plans to leverage hundreds of thousands of ride-sharing and delivery vehicles to create a nationwide license-plate scanning network. A presentation obtained by 404 Media revealed Flock's intention to partner with Nexar, a company with dashcams already installed in approximately 350,000 vehicles, to capture license plates on the move.

This initiative, which Flock states was never executed, would have transformed civilian vehicles into mobile surveillance units, extending the reach of Flock's stationary cameras. Unlike its current pole-mounted cameras that log passing vehicles, the Nexar integration would have enabled real-time tracking across entire regions, filling gaps between fixed surveillance points. Similar mobile ALPR systems are already used by police cruisers and repossession agents.

The proposal comes at a time when Flock faces significant backlash and regulatory pressure. The Los Angeles Police Department recently let its contract with Flock expire, citing serious concerns about civil liberties and privacy. Furthermore, numerous cases of alleged abuse of Flock's license-plate data by law enforcement officers have been documented, leading to resignations and arrests.

Beyond local contract expirations, broader legislative and legal challenges are mounting. Advocacy groups like EPIC are calling for outright bans on automatic license-plate readers (ALPR). States such as Washington have enacted restrictions on ALPR use, while California is considering legislation to limit data sharing. A proposed House bill aims to require warrants for government AI surveillance, and a federal judge has allowed a lawsuit alleging Flock cameras violate Fourth Amendment rights to proceed, referencing the Supreme Court's ruling on warrantless tracking.

Frequently asked questions

Flock stated that the deal with Nexar was never executed.

Flock's standard product is a fixed camera on a pole that records license plates, car color, and make, building a searchable map of vehicle movements.

Flock faces criticism over privacy concerns, potential civil liberties violations, and documented cases of alleged abuse of its license-plate data system by law enforcement.

A federal judge has allowed a lawsuit alleging Flock cameras violate the Fourth Amendment to proceed, citing precedent on warrantless tracking.

What Happens Next

01Flock faces continued opposition and potential legislative action regarding its surveillance technology.
02Further legal challenges regarding the constitutionality of ALPR systems are expected.

Get the newsletter.

Pick the topics you actually care about. We'll email when there's news worth your time, on the cadence you choose. Cancel any time from your account.

Cadence

How It Developed

Flock Safety proposed using Nexar dashcams in 350,000 Uber, Lyft, and delivery cars to scan license plates.
The company stated the Nexar partnership was never launched.
Flock's stationary cameras have faced community protests and vandalism.
The LAPD did not renew its contract with Flock due to civil liberties and privacy concerns.
At least two dozen cases of alleged abuse of Flock's system by officers have been documented.
Advocacy groups urged Congress to ban automatic license-plate readers.
Washington passed a bill restricting ALPR use, and California is considering data-sharing limitations.
A federal judge allowed a lawsuit alleging Flock cameras violate the Fourth Amendment to proceed.

Sources

T1
Flock Wanted to Turn 350,000 Uber Drivers Into a Nationwide Plate-Scanning FleetDecrypt

Related Stories

SEC Bought 1 Billion Airline Records to Track Travelers, Likely Without Warrant
6 Aug · 9:41 PM
ICE ankle monitor tracking surges to nearly 54,000 immigrants
6 Aug · 10:21 PM
ICE to release body camera video only in agency's 'best interests,' policy states
7 Aug · 9:21 AM
Airline workers reportedly refuse to aid US agents in Trump migrant crackdown
6 Aug · 10:31 PM
White House AI vetting plan kept secret from public
7 Aug · 1:11 PM