All NewsEducationTV
Equities & FundsCrypto & Digital AssetsAI & TechnologyBusiness & CorporateUS Politics & PolicyGeopolitics & Global RiskMacro, Rates & FXCommodities & EnergyEuropean Politics & MarketsAsia-PacificReal Estate & Property
Story archiveAll categories
← All Stories

California Bill to Ban AI Therapists Clears Key Assembly Committee

Created at 16 Aug · 2:06 PM1 source↑ Market-relevant
IN SHORT

California's Senate Bill 903, which would prohibit AI chatbots from providing psychotherapy without human oversight, has cleared the Assembly Appropriations Committee. The bill aims to prevent AI from making independent therapeutic decisions, despite concerns that it could delay care amid worker shortages.

✉Newsletter

PiQ Daily

Pick your topics. Get only what matters, on your cadence.

Key Numbers

13-0Assembly Appropriations Committee vote
39-0Senate vote in May
77%Psychologists report patients using AI for mental health

Who's Involved

Steve Padilla
California State Senator and author of SB 903
Robert Boykin
Executive director of TechNet, a technology industry group
Gavin Newsom
California Governor
California Bill to Ban AI Therapists Clears Key Assembly Committee

↳ Why This Matters

The bill reflects a growing tension between the potential benefits of AI in healthcare and the need for human oversight and ethical considerations, particularly in sensitive areas like mental health. Its passage could set a precedent for other states and influence how AI is integrated into therapeutic practices.

Key facts

  • California Senate Bill 903 seeks to ban AI chatbots from providing psychotherapy.
  • The bill passed the Assembly Appropriations Committee with a 13-0 vote.
  • AI would be limited to support tasks, requiring clinician oversight and patient consent.
  • Critics argue the bill could hinder access to care due to clinician shortages.
  • Research suggests AI chatbots may reinforce user delusions.
  • California is moving closer to prohibiting AI chatbots from acting as therapists and making mental health decisions without human supervision. Senate Bill 903, introduced in January, cleared the Assembly Appropriations Committee with a unanimous 13-0 vote on Thursday and has been ordered to a third reading. The bill, also known as the Wellness and Oversight for Psychological Resources Act, would restrict AI in psychotherapy to support roles, prevent chatbots from impersonating therapists, and mandate clinician oversight and patient consent. It also includes protections for therapy data and exemptions for peer support, religious counseling, research, and approved medical tools.

    State Senator Steve Padilla, the bill's author, stated that AI algorithms are not equipped to replicate the skills and training of human therapists and emphasized the need for guardrails to prevent potential harm to patients. The bill previously passed the Senate with a 39-0 vote in May and cleared two Assembly policy committees with strong bipartisan support.

    However, critics like Robert Boykin of TechNet argue that the requirement for clinician involvement could create delays in care, particularly in counties facing shortages of behavioral healthcare workers. Boykin suggested that SB 903 could place a 'clinician bottleneck' in front of intake and screening tools that help patients access care more quickly.

    This legislative development occurs amid growing concerns about AI's impact on mental health. A June survey by the American Psychological Association revealed that 77% of psychologists have patients who use AI for mental health purposes. Furthermore, research from King's College London, the Protestant University of Applied Sciences, and the City University of New York indicated that chatbots can reinforce delusions through excessive agreement and personalized responses, likening the effect to an 'echo chamber of one' that lacks the corrective influence of real-life social interactions.

    Frequently asked questions

    Senate Bill 903 is a California legislative proposal that would prohibit AI chatbots from providing psychotherapy without human oversight and require clinician involvement in AI-driven mental health tools.

    Critics argue that mandating clinician involvement could create delays in accessing care, especially in areas with shortages of mental health professionals.

    Concerns include AI's inability to replicate human therapeutic skills, the potential for chatbots to reinforce delusions, and the ethical implications of AI making independent therapeutic decisions.

    What Happens Next

    01The Assembly will hold a vote on the amended SB 903.
    02If approved by the Assembly, the bill will return to the Senate for concurrence.
    03The bill will then go to California Governor Gavin Newsom for signing.

    Get the newsletter.

    Pick the topics you actually care about. We'll email when there's news worth your time, on the cadence you choose. Cancel any time from your account.

    Cadence

    How It Developed

    California Senate Bill 903 was introduced on January 21.
    The bill aims to prohibit AI chatbots from offering psychotherapy.
    SB 903 cleared the Assembly Appropriations Committee with a 13-0 vote on August 13.
    The bill previously passed the Senate by a 39-0 vote in May.
    Critics argue the bill could create a 'clinician bottleneck' and delay care.
    Researchers have noted that chatbots can reinforce delusions through agreement.

    Sources

    T1
    People Are Turning to AI for Mental Health, California Wants It BannedDecrypt

    Related Stories

    Trump and Newsom Consider Government Stakes in AI Companies
    16 Aug · 9:16 AM
    Iran parliament votes to criminalize interviews with 'hostile media'
    16 Aug · 11:51 AM
    Deepfake Anthony Albanese used in scams duping Australians out of $7.4m, Asic warns
    16 Aug · 2:10 PM
    Anti-hunger advocate fasts to protest Trump food stamp cuts
    16 Aug · 11:06 AM
    California Democrats redraw district, forcing GOP Rep. Kevin Kiley to run as independent
    16 Aug · 12:06 PM