All NewsEducationTV
Equities & FundsCrypto & Digital AssetsAI & TechnologyBusiness & CorporateUS Politics & PolicyGeopolitics & Global RiskMacro, Rates & FXCommodities & EnergyEuropean Politics & MarketsAsia-PacificReal Estate & Property
Story archiveAll categories
← All Stories

Banks Oppose CLARITY Act Stablecoin Provisions, Witt Says

Created at 29 Jul · 6:36 PM1 source↑ Market-relevant
IN SHORT

U.S. banks are urging the Senate to revise the CLARITY Act's stablecoin provisions, specifically Section 10404 which bans interest on payment stablecoins. White House crypto adviser Patrick Witt criticized this stance, calling it contradictory.

✉Newsletter

PiQ Daily

Pick your topics. Get only what matters, on your cadence.

Key Numbers

134banking executives and leaders
10404Section of CLARITY Act restricting stablecoin interest
616pages in updated CLARITY Act draft

Who's Involved

Patrick Witt
White House crypto adviser criticizing banks' position
Senate leaders
Facing narrowed timeline for CLARITY Act vote
Goldman Sachs
CEO expressed support for the CLARITY Act
Bank of America
Signatory to the letter urging stablecoin provision revision
CFTC
Proposed oversight of spot markets for digital commodities
SEC
Proposed oversight of investment contract assets

↳ Why This Matters

The CLARITY Act's stablecoin provisions could significantly impact the digital asset market and the traditional banking sector by defining how stablecoins can be used and rewarded, potentially influencing deposit levels and lending capacity.

Key facts

  • 134 banking executives and leaders asked the Senate to revise the CLARITY Act's stablecoin provisions.
  • The CLARITY Act's Section 10404 restricts interest or yield on payment stablecoins.
  • Banks argue that rewards on stablecoins could lead to deposit outflows, weakening community bank lending.
  • White House crypto adviser Patrick Witt called the banks' position contradictory.
  • The CLARITY Act draft includes provisions for CFTC and SEC oversight of digital assets.
  • Senate leaders are facing a narrowed timeline for a procedural vote on the bill.

U.S. banks are actively opposing certain provisions within the CLARITY Act concerning stablecoins, despite broader interest in the digital asset market. A group of 134 banking executives and leaders has urged the Senate to revise the bill, specifically targeting Section 10404, which prohibits the payment of interest or yield on payment stablecoins.

These banking leaders argue that allowing rewards on stablecoins could incentivize fund flows away from traditional bank deposits, potentially leading to hundreds of billions of dollars in deposit outflows. They contend that such outflows would weaken community banks' ability to provide credit to households, small businesses, and local employers.

White House crypto adviser Patrick Witt has publicly criticized the banking sector's stance, highlighting a perceived contradiction between their calls to protect community bank lending and their opposition to the stablecoin interest ban. He pointed out that the CLARITY Act already includes such a ban, yet banks are still seeking to halt or significantly alter the bill.

The CLARITY Act, recently updated in a 616-page draft by Senate Republicans, aims to establish a comprehensive digital asset market structure. The proposed framework would grant the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) authority over spot markets for digital commodities and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) oversight of investment contract assets. It also includes ethics rules for federal officials regarding digital asset issuance.

Despite initial plans for a procedural vote before the August recess, the timeline for the CLARITY Act has narrowed due to other legislative priorities. Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon has expressed support for the bill, contrasting with the broader banking industry's push for stricter stablecoin regulations.

Frequently asked questions

The CLARITY Act is a proposed U.S. legislative framework for digital asset market structure, aiming to define regulatory authority between the CFTC and SEC.

Banks oppose Section 10404 because it restricts interest or yield on payment stablecoins, which they fear could lead to deposit outflows and weaken community bank lending.

Patrick Witt, a White House crypto adviser, criticizes the banks' opposition to the CLARITY Act's stablecoin interest ban, viewing it as a contradiction.

What Happens Next

01Senate leaders will decide on the timing for a procedural vote on the CLARITY Act.
02Lawmakers will continue to debate and potentially amend the CLARITY Act's stablecoin provisions.
03The banking industry will likely continue to lobby for stricter regulations on stablecoin rewards.

Get the newsletter.

Pick the topics you actually care about. We'll email when there's news worth your time, on the cadence you choose. Cancel any time from your account.

Cadence

How It Developed

banking executives urged the Senate to revise the CLARITY Act's stablecoin provisions.
Banks requested tighter language to ban indirect yield arrangements on payment stablecoins.
Patrick Witt criticized banks for opposing the CLARITY Act's stablecoin interest ban.
The CLARITY Act draft combines texts from Senate Banking and Agriculture Committees.
The bill aims to grant CFTC authority over spot digital commodity markets and SEC oversight of investment contracts.
Senate leaders planned a procedural vote on the CLARITY Act before the August recess.

Sources

T1
Patrick Witt Says Banks Oppose CLARITY Act Despite Stablecoin Interest BanCoinGape

Related Stories

Clarity Act Odds Drop as Ethics Counteroffer Nears White House
29 Jul · 9:46 AM
SEC Chairman Gensler Backs Crypto Clarity Act Amid Lawmaker Push
28 Jul · 10:00 PM
Apple says UK App Store proposal amounts to price regulation
29 Jul · 3:57 PM
Queensland, NT reject Labor's AI data centre renewable energy mandate
29 Jul · 3:31 AM
Morgan Stanley mortgage staff reportedly faced pressure to approve loans
29 Jul · 3:31 PM