HomeEverything
Equities & FundsCrypto & Digital AssetsAI & TechnologyBusiness & CorporateUS Politics & PolicyGeopolitics & Global RiskMacro, Rates & FXCommodities & EnergyEuropean Politics & MarketsAsia-PacificReal Estate & Property
← All Stories

Australia mandates country of origin labeling for seafood on menus

Created at 30 Jun · 3:11 PM1 source↑ Market-relevant
IN SHORT

Australian hospitality venues must now indicate the country of origin for seafood products on their menus, using 'A' for Australian, 'I' for imported, and 'M' for mixed. The government aims to provide consumers with more information and support local businesses.

✉Newsletter

PiQ Daily

Pick your topics. Get only what matters, on your cadence.

Key Numbers

64%percentage of seafood imported into Australia

Who's Involved

Julie Petty
General Manager of Seafood Industry Australia
Juan Carlos Negrete
Chef and co-owner of Maiz restaurant
Tim Ayres
Minister for Industry
Julie Collins
Federal fisheries minister
Kim Riskas
Campaigner for the Australian Marine Conservation Society

↳ Why This Matters

The new labeling system aims to increase transparency for consumers regarding seafood origins, potentially influencing purchasing decisions and supporting the Australian seafood industry by differentiating local products from imports.

Key facts

  • Hospitality venues in Australia must now display the country of origin for seafood on menus.
  • The labeling system uses 'A' for Australian, 'I' for imported, and 'M' for mixed seafood.
  • The changes aim to inform consumers and support the Australian seafood industry.
  • Exemptions apply to shelf-stable seafood items like canned tuna and food served in schools, hospitals, and prisons.

From July 1, Australian diners will see a new country of origin designation for seafood on menus across the country. The federal government has implemented a mandatory labeling system, known as 'Aim', requiring hospitality venues to specify whether seafood is Australian ('A'), imported ('I'), or a mix ('M').

Seafood Industry Australia general manager Julie Petty, who advocated for the change, noted that approximately 64% of seafood consumed in Australia is imported. She stated the new system provides crucial clarity to consumers, enabling informed choices about their purchases. The labeling requirement extends to market stalls, food trucks, and fast-food venues, with options to use 'A', 'I', or 'M' beside menu items, similar to 'GF' for gluten-free or 'V' for vegetarian designations. Detailed wording such as 'Australian Sydney rock lobster' also complies.

Certain exclusions apply, including dishes with only shelf-stable seafood like canned tuna or fish stock, and food service providers in schools, hospitals, and prisons are exempt. Juan Carlos Negrete, chef and co-owner of Sydney restaurant Maiz, acknowledged the changes and used the opportunity to highlight Australian seafood on his menu, despite its higher cost. He believes transparency justifies the price for consumers and has not found it a significant disadvantage.

Some hospitality owners were reportedly unaware of the 'Aim' system until recently, leading to a rush to update menus. Minister for Industry Tim Ayres emphasized that the changes will ensure customers have the necessary information to choose Australian seafood, citing its quality, safety, and support for coastal communities. Federal fisheries minister Julie Collins stated the initiative aims to address consumer confusion about seafood origins.

However, campaigners like Kim Riskas from the Australian Marine Conservation Society point out that the 'I' and 'M' labels are broad, encompassing all non-Australian origins without specifying fishing practices or exact countries. Riskas advocates for more detailed information, such as including the Australian state or territory of origin for domestic seafood, aligning with the Australian fish names standard.

Frequently asked questions

Venues must label seafood with 'A' for Australian origin, 'I' for imported, or 'M' for mixed origin.

Yes, dishes containing only shelf-stable seafood like canned tuna, shrimp paste, or fish stock are exempt. Food service providers in schools, hospitals, and prisons are also exempt.

The government stated the system aims to provide consumers with more information, enable informed choices, and support Australian businesses and fishing communities.

Critics argue that the 'imported' and 'mixed' labels are too broad and do not provide enough detail about the specific country of origin or fishing practices.

What Happens Next

01Venues must comply with the new seafood origin labeling requirements from July 1.

Get the newsletter.

Pick the topics you actually care about. We'll email when there's news worth your time, on the cadence you choose. Cancel any time from your account.

Cadence

How It Developed

Australia mandated country of origin labeling for seafood on menus starting July 1.
The 'Aim' system requires venues to label seafood as 'A' for Australian, 'I' for imported, or 'M' for mixed.
Seafood Industry Australia general manager Julie Petty stated that 64% of seafood consumed in Australia is imported.
Chef Juan Carlos Negrete of Maiz restaurant highlighted the opportunity to emphasize Australian seafood despite higher costs.
Minister for Industry Tim Ayres stated the changes will ensure customers have information to buy Australian seafood.
Federal fisheries minister Julie Collins announced the new labeling system.
Australian Marine Conservation Society campaigner Kim Riskas noted the labels lack detail on specific countries of origin or fishing practices.

Sources

T1
What’s the catch? Menus across Australia to show seafood’s country of originThe Guardian

Related Stories

Australia sues Amazon unit over alleged breach via Prime Video ads
29 Jun · 11:14 PM
South Korea to implement facial verification for new mobile phones
30 Jun · 4:45 AM
EY graduate sacked over alleged access to PM's bank data
30 Jun · 3:24 AM
Labor's gambling ad reforms called 'capitulation' by Liberal MP
30 Jun · 10:10 AM
Trump student loan changes effective July 1, but borrowers have time to act
29 Jun · 6:10 PM