HomeEverything
Equities & FundsCrypto & Digital AssetsAI & TechnologyBusiness & CorporateUS Politics & PolicyGeopolitics & Global RiskMacro, Rates & FXCommodities & EnergyEuropean Politics & MarketsAsia-PacificReal Estate & Property
← All Stories

Appeals court limits ICE detention expansion

Created at 2 Jul · 10:30 PM2 sources↑ Market-relevant2 events
IN SHORT

A U.S. appeals court ruled that Immigration and Customs Enforcement cannot detain individuals for more than 90 days without a bond hearing under the Trump administration's mass detention policy. The decision could impact thousands of detained immigrants.

✉Newsletter

PiQ Daily

Pick your topics. Get only what matters, on your cadence.

Key Numbers

90 daysmaximum detention without bond hearing
2-1panel vote on the ruling
2001year of Supreme Court due process ruling

Who's Involved

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)
Subject of the appeals court ruling on detention policy
5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
Court that issued the ruling limiting detention
President Donald Trump
Associated with the immigration crackdown and detention policy
U.S. Supreme Court
Asked to resolve the issue of detention policy interpretation
Leslie Southwick
U.S. Circuit Judge writing for the majority
Cory Wilson
U.S. Circuit Judge who dissented
American Immigration Council
Lawyer group representing the migrants
U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Oversees ICE and did not respond to requests for comment
Board of Immigration Appeals
Part of the Justice Department that adopted the interpretation
6th Circuit Court of Appeals
Previously rejected the administration's detention policy
Appeals court limits ICE detention expansion

↳ Why This Matters

The ruling significantly limits the Trump administration's ability to expand immigration detention without due process, potentially impacting thousands of individuals and setting a precedent for how immigration laws are interpreted regarding detention and bond hearings.

Key facts

  • A U.S. appeals court ruled that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) cannot detain individuals for more than 90 days without a bond hearing under the Trump administration's mass detention policy.
  • The ruling by the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals could affect thousands of detained immigrants in states like Texas and Louisiana.
  • The court cited the Fifth Amendment's due process clause, stating it protects basic rights, including the right to be heard when personal liberty is taken.
  • The Trump administration had reinterpreted federal immigration law to apply mandatory detention to non-citizens already residing in the U.S., not just those arriving at the border.
  • The Trump administration has asked the Supreme Court to resolve the divided interpretations among federal appeals courts.
  • The 6th Circuit Court of Appeals had previously rejected the administration's detention policy, finding a due process right for ICE detainees.

A divided U.S. appeals court has ruled that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) cannot detain individuals for more than 90 days without providing them a chance to be released on bond, a decision that could affect thousands of immigrants detained under the Trump administration's policies.

The 2-1 ruling by the New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals found that the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment protects individuals, including non-citizens, from indefinite detention without a hearing.

This decision potentially impacts immigrants detained in Texas and Louisiana, states within the 5th Circuit's jurisdiction. The ruling challenges a previous interpretation by the Trump administration and the Board of Immigration Appeals that allowed for mandatory detention of non-citizens already residing in the U.S., not just those arriving at the border.

While one judge dissented, arguing the majority overlooked Congress's authority over immigration, the majority opinion emphasized the constitutional right to be heard when personal liberty is at stake. The U.S. Department of Homeland Security has not yet commented on the ruling.

Appeals courts have been divided on this interpretation of immigration law, leading the Trump administration to seek resolution from the U.S. Supreme Court. The 6th Circuit Court of Appeals had previously ruled against the administration's detention policy, citing due process rights.

Frequently asked questions

ICE reinterpreted federal immigration law to mandate detention without bond for non-citizens already residing in the U.S., not just those arriving at the border, and extended this to individuals apprehended within the country.

The court ruled that ICE cannot detain individuals for more than 90 days without providing them a chance to be released on bond, citing Fifth Amendment due process protections.

The ruling was made by a 2-1 panel of the New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

The Trump administration has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to resolve the differing interpretations of the law among federal appeals courts.

What Happens Next

01The ruling is likely to reverberate in hundreds of ICE detainee cases in Texas.
02The Trump administration has urged the Supreme Court to take up the issue.
03Further litigation may be required to establish standards for bond hearings.

Get the newsletter.

Pick the topics you actually care about. We'll email when there's news worth your time, on the cadence you choose. Cancel any time from your account.

Cadence

How It Developed

An appeals court limited ICE's detention expansion, ruling against mandatory detention for immigrants without criminal records.
A U.S. appeals court ruled that Immigration and Customs Enforcement cannot detain people for more than 90 days under the Trump administration's mass detention policy without providing them a chance to
The ruling could affect thousands of individuals detained in states within the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals' jurisdiction, including Texas and Louisiana.
The court cited the Fifth Amendment's due process clause, stating it protects basic rights, including the right to be heard when personal liberty is taken.
A dissenting judge argued the majority marginalized Congress's plenary authority over immigration matters.
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security did not respond to a request for comment.
Federal immigration law previously stated that 'applicants for admission' were subject to mandatory detention and ineligible for bond hearings.
The Trump administration's interpretation extended mandatory detention to non-citizens already residing in the U.S., not just those arriving at the border.

Sources

T1
Trump administration cannot hold migrants without bond hearings past 90 days, court rulesReuters
T1
Appeals court sharply limits ICE’s massive expansion of detentionPolitico

Related Stories

Appeals court blocks firing of 19 intelligence officers over DEI roles
2 Jul · 2:57 PM
ICE arrests 10,000 in 5 days amid Trump deportation push
2 Jul · 8:21 PM
US court allows Trump administration to avoid reinstalling park exhibits
2 Jul · 4:56 PM
US judge halts Philadelphia's 'ICE Out' ban on masked federal law enforcement agents
2 Jul · 4:27 PM
Los Angeles-area gas appliance ban upheld by US appeals court
2 Jul · 6:31 PM