All NewsEducationTVBrokers
Equities & FundsCrypto & Digital AssetsAI & TechnologyBusiness & CorporateUS Politics & PolicyGeopolitics & Global RiskMacro, Rates & FXCommodities & EnergyEuropean Politics & MarketsAsia-PacificReal Estate & Property
All NewsHome
← Back to US Politics & Policy

US court finds fishery council unconstitutionally powerful, upholds catch limits

Created at 3 Sep · 10:14 PM2 sources↑ Market-relevant2 events
IN SHORT

A federal appeals court ruled the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council exercised unconstitutional powers by improperly blocking Commerce Secretary actions. However, the court upheld a rule limiting gag grouper catch by 86%, stating the council's excessive authority was unrelated to the regulation.

Key Numbers

3-0court decision vote
86%estimated gag grouper catch limit reduction

Who's Involved

Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council
council found to have unconstitutional powers
Dominick and James Russo
commercial fishermen challenging the catch limits
Andrew Brasher
Circuit Judge who wrote the opinion
Michael Poon
lawyer for the fishermen from Pacific Legal Foundation
U.S. Department of Commerce
defendant in the case
National Marine Fisheries Service
defendant in the case
US court finds fishery council unconstitutionally powerful, upholds catch limits

↳ Why This Matters

The ruling clarifies the balance of power between Congress-established councils and the executive branch in environmental regulation, while maintaining existing conservation measures.

Key facts

  • A federal appeals court determined the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council held unconstitutional powers.
  • The court found the council's law improperly granted it authority to block Commerce Secretary actions.
  • The court upheld a rule that limits the annual catch of gag grouper by an estimated 86%.
  • The court stated the council's improper veto powers were unrelated to the gag grouper rule.
  • The ruling ordered a lower court to enter a judgment in favor of the government.

A federal appeals court has ruled that the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council, established by Congress, exercised unconstitutional powers. The 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta found that the law creating the council improperly granted it the authority to block actions by the U.S. Commerce Secretary, including the repeal of fishery management plans designed to prevent overfishing.

Despite this finding, the court rejected a challenge brought by two commercial fishermen, Dominick and James Russo, against a rule that limits the annual catch of gag grouper by an estimated 86%. The fishermen had argued the rule should be voided because council members were improperly appointed and wielded significant federal authority, violating the U.S. Constitution's Appointments Clause.

Circuit Judge Andrew Brasher, agreeing with other federal appeals courts that the council had too much power, stated that the "misallocation of authority" did not justify addressing the appointment of council members or vacating the gag grouper rule. He noted that "All agree that the veto powers had nothing to do with the rule," and that the Council made an advisory proposal which the Secretary independently adopted.

The ruling ordered a lower court judge to enter a judgment favoring the government. Michael Poon, a lawyer representing the Russos, stated that they are considering their next steps, emphasizing that actions taken by unconstitutionally appointed officials are void. The U.S. Department of Commerce and the National Marine Fisheries Service declined to comment.

Frequently asked questions

The court found that the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council exercised unconstitutional powers by improperly blocking actions of the Commerce Secretary.

No, the court upheld the rule limiting the annual catch of gag grouper, stating the council's excessive power was unrelated to that specific regulation.

Two commercial fishermen, Dominick and James Russo, challenged the rule, arguing it should be voided due to the council's improper appointment and authority.

The Appointments Clause of the U.S. Constitution governs how federal officials are appointed. The fishermen argued the council members' appointments violated this clause.

What Happens Next

01The Russos are considering their next legal steps.
02A lower court judge will enter a judgment favoring the government.

How It Developed

A U.S. appeals court ruled a fishery council's powers unconstitutional but upheld an overfishing rule for Gulf of Mexico gag grouper.
A federal appeals court ruled that a council established by Congress to aid the U.S. commerce secretary in managing fisheries exercised unconstitutional powers.
The court upheld a rule limiting the annual catch of gag grouper by an estimated 86%.
The court stated the council's improper veto powers were unrelated to the gag grouper rule.
The ruling ordered a lower court to enter a judgment in favor of the government.

Sources

T1
US court says Gulf of Mexico fishery council has too much power, but overfishing rule can standReuters
T1
US court says Gulf of Mexico fishery council has too much power, but overfishing rule can standPiQSuite

Related Stories

Judge blocks EPA from sending California emissions rules to Congress
3 Sep · 1:08 AM
Trump administration asks Supreme Court to lift mail-in ballot rule block
3 Sep · 8:27 PM
Missouri court blocks Trump-backed US House map, orders public vote
3 Sep · 10:06 PM
SEC proposes reforms to political contribution rule for investment advisers
3 Sep · 8:44 PM
US Sanctions Raul Castro's Grandson, Cuban Companies
3 Sep · 5:27 PM