UK Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband has voiced stronger criticism of Israel's actions in the occupied West Bank and Gaza, acknowledging the unlawfulness of settlements and referencing UN findings on genocide. While welcoming new measures like a ban on settlement products, the government is urged to do more to align its policy with international law, particularly regarding state-level accountability and preventing genocide.

The UK's stance on Israeli settlements and actions in Gaza has significant implications for international law, human rights, and the broader Middle East peace process. Stricter adherence to international law by a major global power could influence other nations and potentially lead to greater accountability for alleged war crimes and human rights violations.
Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband has signaled a potential shift in UK policy regarding Israel, acknowledging the unlawfulness of settlements and referencing international legal bodies. Speaking with Prime Minister Andy Burnham present, Miliband described the occupation of the West Bank as unlawful, citing "settler terrorism" and "ethnic cleansing" which has led to the displacement of 65 Palestinian communities since 2023. He also noted that aid to Gaza has been "routinely blocked" and hospitals destroyed, referencing a UN inquiry that found Israel is committing acts of genocide. The UK government stated its support for the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in its determination on whether genocide has occurred.
Miliband criticized Israel's operations since a recent ceasefire, stating that the occupation of Gaza has increased and resulted in the deaths of 1,200 Palestinians. This marks a departure from the previous government's stance, with former Prime Minister Keir Starmer having previously stated Israel had the right to cut off Gaza's power and water, and former Foreign Secretary David Lammy having reportedly ridiculed genocide assertions.
In response to these concerns, the UK announced a ban on settlement products and advertising for settlements. The government also vowed to take action against specific companies and individuals involved in financing or facilitating settlement expansion, threatening them with UK sanctions. Furthermore, the government plans to extend its global human rights regime to deter settlement expansion.
However, the article argues these measures fall short of legal obligations, as Israeli settlements are described as a state project rather than a private enterprise. The author contends that sanctioning contractors while exempting the commissioning government is insufficient. A report by over 80 organizations, including the International Centre of Justice for Palestinians, detailed the Israeli state's role in encouraging companies to operate in occupied territories through incentives, subsidies, and infrastructure. Miliband's focus on the UK's relationship with the "occupied territories" rather than the occupying state is also noted as a limitation.