All NewsEducationTVBrokers
Equities & FundsCrypto & Digital AssetsAI & TechnologyBusiness & CorporateUS Politics & PolicyGeopolitics & Global RiskMacro, Rates & FXCommodities & EnergyEuropean Politics & MarketsAsia-PacificReal Estate & Property
All NewsHome
← Back to Real Estate & Property

Poorest Americans struggle for housing amid empty low-income units

Created at 7 Sep · 11:41 AM1 source↑ Market-relevant
IN SHORT

The poorest individuals in the U.S. face severe housing shortages, despite a growing number of low-income units sitting vacant. Many affordable housing units are financed for those earning 50% of area median income or higher, making them unaffordable for the extremely low-income population.

Key Numbers

$450monthly rent for a tiny home with communal bathroom
4,500+vacant affordable units in Austin
16%affordable housing vacancy rate in Austin
4 millionaffordable rental units available nationwide
11 millionextremely low-income renter households
$16,000annual income for a single-person household below federal poverty guidelines
30%median income threshold for extremely low-income households
75%extremely low-income households paying over half income on rent
12%affordable housing units financed for extremely low-income renters in 2024
50%area median income target for majority of financed affordable housing
$47,000annual income for a single person at 50% AMI in Austin
$28,000annual income for an extremely low-income person in Austin
40 yearssince creation of Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program
1-in-4eligible families receiving housing vouchers
60%area median income for affordable housing example
$70,000annual income for 60% AMI in Washington D.C. area
$1,715monthly rent for 60% AMI unit
$1,575mortgage and operating expenses for 60% AMI unit
$140leftover from rent after expenses for 60% AMI unit
13%vacancy rate for 60% AMI units in Denver
21%vacancy rate for 80% AMI units in Denver

Who's Involved

Mathew Davis
homeless shelter resident in Austin, Texas
National Low Income Housing Coalition
organization reporting on affordable housing availability
National Council of State Housing Agencies
organization providing figures on housing tax credit financing
Chris Edwards
economist at the Cato Institute critical of housing tax credit program
Carmen Romero
President and CEO of True Ground Housing Partners
LDG Development
affordable housing developer
Rebekah Fischer
Chief Portfolio Officer at LDG Development
CoStar
real estate data and analytics firm

↳ Why This Matters

This situation highlights a critical failure in the U.S. housing system where the most vulnerable populations are excluded from affordable housing options, exacerbating homelessness and economic hardship, despite available units. It raises questions about the effectiveness and targeting of current housing subsidy programs.

Key facts

  • The poorest individuals in the U.S. face significant housing insecurity, with millions of extremely low-income households lacking affordable options.
  • A substantial number of designated affordable housing units are sitting empty because their rents are too high for the poorest residents.
  • The majority of affordable housing financed in recent years targets those earning 50% or more of an area's median income, leaving the most vulnerable behind.
  • The Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program, a key federal initiative, is criticized for its complexity and for not adequately serving the extremely low-income population.
  • In cities like Austin and Denver, vacancy rates for affordable housing are rising as rents approach market-rate levels, creating competition for renters.

The poorest individuals in the United States are struggling to find housing, even as a significant number of low-income units sit empty. This paradox arises because many affordable housing units, particularly those financed through programs like the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit, are designed for individuals earning 50% or more of an area's median income, leaving those with extremely low incomes unable to afford them.

Nationwide, there are only about 4 million affordable rental units available for 11 million extremely low-income renter households. These households, often earning below the federal poverty line or 30% of the median income, frequently spend over half their income on rent and utilities, leaving little for other necessities. The Low-Income Housing Tax Credit, while having financed millions of units over 40 years, is criticized by some experts for its complexity and cost, with suggestions that direct tenant subsidies like housing vouchers would be more efficient.

However, housing developers argue that without substantial subsidies, it is not economically feasible to create units for extremely low-income people, as their expenses often exceed the rent these individuals can pay. Meanwhile, in cities like Austin, Denver, and Portland, rents for affordable units targeting 60% of the median income are approaching market rates. This leads some potential renters to opt for market-rate apartments due to less stringent application processes and faster approval times, contributing to rising vacancy rates in designated affordable housing.

In Austin, nearly 16% of affordable housing units are vacant, totaling over 4,500 units. Similarly, Denver is experiencing vacancy rates of 13% for units designated for 60% AMI and 21% for those at 80% AMI, according to data from CoStar and the Colorado Housing Finance Authority.

Frequently asked questions

The main problem is that the poorest Americans cannot afford housing even when low-income units are vacant because the rents are too high for their income levels.

It is a federal program that provides tax credits to developers in exchange for keeping rents low for at least 30 years, aiming to finance affordable housing.

Rents for these units are often too high for extremely low-income individuals, and some renters opt for market-rate apartments due to simpler application processes.

Housing vouchers are a form of direct tenant subsidy that can help eligible families pay for housing, including units targeted at higher income groups.

What Happens Next

01Further analysis of the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program is expected.
02Discussions regarding the expansion of housing voucher programs may intensify.
03Cities may re-evaluate their affordable housing strategies to better serve extremely low-income populations.

How It Developed

Mathew Davis, a homeless shelter resident in Austin, Texas, struggles to afford housing on his plasma donation income.
Over 4,500 affordable housing units in Austin, nearly 16%, are vacant.
The majority of recently financed low-income housing targets individuals earning 50% or more of an area's median income.
Only about 4 million affordable rental units are available for 11 million extremely low-income renter households nationwide.
Extremely low-income households often pay over half their income on rent and utilities.
The Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program, a primary source of affordable housing, finances few units for the extremely low-income.
Experts criticize the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit for complexity and cost, suggesting direct tenant subsidies like housing vouchers.
Affordable housing rents for 60% AMI units are nearing market rates in cities like Austin, Denver, and Portland.

Sources

T1
The poorest in the US can’t find housing even as low-income units sit emptyAP News

Related Stories

California Shipyard & Housing Bill Stalls Amid Environmental Concerns
7 Sep · 10:06 AM
Hong Kong landlords accuse banks of deepening shop slump with reluctance to lend
7 Sep · 11:05 AM
EU proposes rules to curb short-term rentals, ease housing costs
7 Sep · 10:40 AM
George Morales on proprietary reverse mortgages and MISMO standards
7 Sep · 10:06 AM
Home ownership should be a 5-year goal, Legco president says
7 Sep · 6:35 AM