All NewsEducationTVBrokers
Equities & FundsCrypto & Digital AssetsAI & TechnologyBusiness & CorporateUS Politics & PolicyGeopolitics & Global RiskMacro, Rates & FXCommodities & EnergyEuropean Politics & MarketsAsia-PacificReal Estate & Property
All NewsHome
← Back to Real Estate & Property

Objector Seeks Rehearing in NAR Settlement Appeals

Created at 3 Sep · 4:21 PM1 source↑ Market-relevant
IN SHORT

Robert Friedman, a plaintiff in a copycat commission lawsuit, has petitioned for a rehearing after his appeal challenging the approval of settlements in the Sitzer/Burnett and Gibson cases was denied. He argues the appeals court applied the wrong legal standard.

Who's Involved

Robert Friedman
Plaintiff and objector petitioning for rehearing in NAR settlement appeals
Eight Circuit Court of Appeals
Court that denied Friedman's appeal and reaffirmed settlement approvals
National Association of Realtors (NAR)
Organization involved in the commission lawsuit settlements
Real Estate Board of New York (REBNY)
Organization named in Friedman's separate lawsuit
Objector Seeks Rehearing in NAR Settlement Appeals

↳ Why This Matters

This action could potentially lead to separate litigation for claims against REBNY, impacting how commission structures are challenged outside of the broader NAR settlements and influencing future real estate commission lawsuits.

Key facts

  • Robert Friedman has petitioned for a rehearing after his appeal of the NAR commission lawsuit settlements was denied.
  • The Eight Circuit Court of Appeals had previously reaffirmed the final approval of settlements in the Sitzer/Burnett and Gibson lawsuits.
  • Friedman argued that his lawsuit against the Real Estate Board of New York (REBNY) was distinct from the NAR settlements.
  • He claimed REBNY's alleged conspiracy was unrelated to those in the Gibson and Sitzer/Burnett suits.
  • Friedman contends the appeals court used an incorrect legal standard and should not have deferred to the lower court.
  • He also argued REBNY, not affiliated with NAR, should not be included in a settlement tied to NAR rules.

Robert Friedman, a plaintiff in a commission lawsuit, has filed a petition for a rehearing after his appeal challenging the approval of settlements in the Sitzer/Burnett and Gibson cases was denied. The Eight Circuit Court of Appeals had previously reaffirmed the final approval of the National Association of Realtors’ (NAR) settlement in the Sitzer/Burnett suit and several settlements by brokerage defendants in the Gibson lawsuit.

Friedman, whose own commission lawsuit journey began in 2023 against the Real Estate Board of New York (REBNY), alleged a conspiracy resulting in inflated agent commissions. He argued in his appeal that this conspiracy with REBNY was distinct and unrelated to the alleged conspiracies in the Gibson and Sitzer/Burnett suits, particularly because REBNY is not affiliated with NAR and operates under its own rules.

The appeals court disagreed with Friedman's reasoning, upholding the settlements. In his request for a rehearing, Friedman asserts that the court applied the wrong legal standard in reviewing his objections and should not have deferred to the lower court's decision. He also reiterated that REBNY should not be included in a settlement tied to NAR's rules due to their lack of affiliation.

If Friedman's petition for a rehearing is granted and he is successful, his claims against REBNY could be litigated separately. He is currently the only objector to have filed such a petition. Other appellants in the Gibson suit have until later this month to file their own petitions for a rehearing.

Frequently asked questions

Robert Friedman is a plaintiff in a commission lawsuit and an objector who has filed a petition for a rehearing after his appeal of the NAR settlement approvals was denied.

He is appealing the final approval of settlements in the Sitzer/Burnett suit and several settlements reached by brokerage defendants in the Gibson lawsuit, both related to National Association of Realtors (NAR) commission structures.

Friedman argues that the appeals court used the wrong legal standard in reviewing his objections and that REBNY, which is not affiliated with NAR, should not have been included in a settlement involving NAR's rules.

Friedman argues that because REBNY is not affiliated with NAR and has its own rules, its alleged conspiracy should be litigated separately and not be bound by settlements related to NAR's rules.

What Happens Next

01Other appellants in the Gibson suit have until later this month to file for rehearing.
02The court will decide whether to grant Friedman's petition for a rehearing.

How It Developed

Robert Friedman filed a petition for a rehearing.
Friedman's appeal of the NAR commission lawsuit settlements was denied.
Appeals court reaffirmed approval of settlements in Sitzer/Burnett and Gibson suits.
Friedman argues the appeals court used the wrong legal standard.
Friedman contends REBNY should not be part of a settlement involving NAR rules.
Other appellants in the Gibson suit have until later this month to file for rehearing.

Sources

T1
Objector petitions for rehearing in NAR settlement appealsHousingWire

Related Stories

Compass-NWMLS Settlement Introduces 'First Look' Listing Status
2 Sep · 8:46 PM
New American Funding lays off 160 employees amid mortgage market headwinds
3 Sep · 4:15 PM
eXp Realty ends mortgage JV with Kind Lending, eyes Newrez partnership
2 Sep · 8:31 PM
David Jent Realty affiliates with REMAX in Tennessee
3 Sep · 1:46 PM
HECM volume slips in August, with 'Big 3' holding 62% market share
2 Sep · 4:51 PM