All NewsEducationTVBrokers
Equities & FundsCrypto & Digital AssetsAI & TechnologyBusiness & CorporateUS Politics & PolicyGeopolitics & Global RiskMacro, Rates & FXCommodities & EnergyEuropean Politics & MarketsAsia-PacificReal Estate & Property
All NewsHome
← Back to US Politics & Policy

Lawyer Who Won First Tesla Autopilot Jury Case Cites Case Volume

Created at 1 Sep · 8:16 AM1 source↑ Market-relevant
IN SHORT

Brett Schreiber, the lawyer who led the first successful jury verdict against Tesla over its Autopilot system, stated that his firm receives numerous inquiries about potential cases. However, the high cost of litigation limits the firm to only reviewing cases involving catastrophic injuries or fatalities.

Key Numbers

2005Year Brett Schreiber began practicing law
2021Year Schreiber began receiving calls about Tesla crashes
$1M+Litigation costs in the Benavides case
$10M+Minimum case value for Schreiber's firm to pursue
2025Year of the jury verdict
$242.5M+Damages ordered by the jury

Who's Involved

Brett Schreiber
Plaintiff trial lawyer who led the first jury win against Tesla involving Autopilot
Naibel Benavides Leon
Plaintiff in the Miami Autopilot case, who died in the crash
Dillon Angulo
Plaintiff seriously injured in the Miami Autopilot case
Tesla
Automaker facing a jury verdict and appeal over Autopilot system
Elon Musk
Commented on the limitations of Tesla's autonomous driving capabilities
Lawyer Who Won First Tesla Autopilot Jury Case Cites Case Volume

↳ Why This Matters

The high volume of inquiries and the significant costs associated with autonomous vehicle litigation highlight the ongoing legal and financial challenges surrounding advanced driver-assistance systems. The case sets a precedent for future lawsuits against automakers regarding the capabilities and marketing of self-driving technology.

Key facts

  • Brett Schreiber led the first jury verdict against Tesla concerning its Autopilot system.
  • A federal jury in Miami found Tesla partially responsible for a fatal crash.
  • Tesla was ordered to pay over $242.5 million in damages.
  • Tesla is appealing the jury's decision.
  • Schreiber's firm receives numerous inquiries about potential Tesla Autopilot and Full Self-Driving cases.
  • The high cost of litigation limits Schreiber's firm to cases involving severe injuries or deaths.

Brett Schreiber, a California-based lawyer, has stated that his firm continues to receive a high volume of inquiries regarding potential legal cases involving Tesla's Autopilot and Full Self-Driving systems. Schreiber led the legal team in the first successful jury verdict against Tesla concerning its Autopilot technology, a case that resulted in a jury finding Tesla partially responsible for a crash that killed Naibel Benavides Leon and seriously injured Dillon Angulo. The jury ordered Tesla to pay over $242.5 million in damages, though the company is currently appealing the decision.

Schreiber noted that while his firm gets dozens of calls monthly from across the country, the vast majority involve minor injuries that are not feasible to pursue due to the significant litigation costs, which can exceed $1 million. His firm must limit its caseload to instances of catastrophic injuries or fatalities to make the economics of contingency law work.

The Benavides case, according to Schreiber, focused on shared responsibility, arguing that Tesla's decisions to overstate and oversell its technology years before the collision contributed to drivers over-relying on it. He explained that unlike traditional auto product liability cases with established playbooks, autonomous vehicle litigation is in its nascent stages, with challenges in explaining complex algorithmic failures to juries. Schreiber also pointed out that many Tesla vehicles still on the road use older sensor technology, and over-the-air updates may not fully address the limitations of these systems, a point echoed by Elon Musk's recent comments on hardware upgrades for full self-driving capabilities.

Frequently asked questions

A federal jury found Tesla partially responsible for a crash, ordering the company to pay over $242.5 million in damages. Tesla is appealing this verdict.

The high cost of litigation, exceeding $1 million in the Benavides case, means Schreiber's firm can only pursue cases involving catastrophic injuries or fatalities.

Schreiber argues for shared responsibility, stating that while the driver may have failed to be attentive, Tesla's decisions to overstate its technology contributed to driver over-reliance.

Unlike traditional auto litigation, there is no established playbook for AV lawsuits, and explaining complex algorithmic failures to juries is a significant challenge.

What Happens Next

01Tesla's appeal of the jury verdict is ongoing.
02Schreiber's firm will continue to evaluate potential Autopilot and Full Self-Driving cases.

How It Developed

Brett Schreiber, a lawyer, led the first jury win against Tesla involving Autopilot.
A federal jury found Tesla partially responsible for a crash that killed Naibel Benavides Leon and injured Dillon Angulo.
The jury ordered Tesla to pay over $242.5 million in damages.
Tesla is appealing the verdict.
Schreiber's firm receives dozens of calls monthly regarding Tesla Autopilot or Full Self-Driving incidents.
The high cost of litigation, over $1 million in the Benavides case, restricts the firm to cases with catastrophic injuries or fatalities.

Sources

T1
I led the first jury win against Tesla’s Autopilot. I get too many inquiries on potential cases to review them all.Business Insider

Related Stories

Australian judge may order Tesla access to engineering systems in class action
1 Sep · 2:12 AM
Meta whistleblower criticizes $17B settlement for child safety
31 Aug · 1:36 PM
Point's Matt Windsor Advocates for Regulatory Clarity in Home Equity Investments
31 Aug · 10:06 AM
Doctor's phone call exposes patient data, Guernsey watchdog reveals
31 Aug · 10:16 AM
Jeju police officer cites workload for closing missing person cases
1 Sep · 2:56 AM