Key facts
- Defense lawyers for Tyler Robinson argued against the death penalty in a court filing.
Attorneys for Tyler Robinson, accused of murdering conservative activist Charlie Kirk, argued in a court filing that the death penalty is unwarranted because the single shot fired hit its intended target and did not endanger others.

This case is a significant legal test concerning the application of the death penalty in alleged politically motivated killings, with implications for how such cases are prosecuted and defended in Utah.
Attorneys for Tyler Robinson, the Utah man accused of murdering conservative activist Charlie Kirk, argued this week that he should not face the death penalty. In a court filing ahead of a September 1 hearing, Robinson's lawyers contended that the single shot that killed Kirk did not create the "high probability" of death to others required under state law as an aggravating factor for capital punishment.
Prosecutors are seeking the death penalty, alleging Robinson knowingly created a risk of death to others by firing from a rooftop vantage point with a scoped rifle and loading four rounds. The defense countered that the shot hit the intended target and did not endanger anyone else.
Kirk was killed on September 10, 2025, at Utah Valley University during a campus debate. Robinson, 23, has yet to enter a plea in the case. The case is being closely watched as a test of how Utah handles the alleged political killing of an ally of President Donald Trump.