All NewsEducationTVBrokers
Equities & FundsCrypto & Digital AssetsAI & TechnologyBusiness & CorporateUS Politics & PolicyGeopolitics & Global RiskMacro, Rates & FXCommodities & EnergyEuropean Politics & MarketsAsia-PacificReal Estate & Property
All NewsHome
← Back to Macro, Rates & FX

BLS Revisions Show Smaller Job Growth Than Initially Reported

Created at 1 Sep · 5:07 PM1 source↑ Market-relevant
IN SHORT

The Bureau of Labor Statistics' 2026 revisions indicate a downward adjustment of 0.1% in the total workforce, suggesting job growth is weaker than preliminary estimates. This follows significant revisions to May and June job gains.

Key Numbers

0.1 percentdownward adjustment of total workforce
73,000July preliminary job gains
139,000 to 19,000May preliminary job gains revision
147,000 to 14,000June preliminary job gains revision
a quarter millionfewer jobs gained than initially reported (May & June)
86%May job gains fall from preliminary to final
nearly two decadestime since last large downward revision
44,000September 2007 final job gains revision
110,000September 2007 preliminary job gains
32,000average revision from preliminary to final since 2023
+/-136,000confidence interval for preliminary estimates
43%response rate for March employment data

Who's Involved

Bureau of Labor Statistics
Federal agency responsible for employment data
Erika McEntarfer
BLS Commissioner fired by President Trump
Donald Trump
President who claimed July jobs report was 'rigged'
BLS Revisions Show Smaller Job Growth Than Initially Reported

↳ Why This Matters

The accuracy of U.S. jobs numbers is crucial for policymakers, financial markets, and the media to assess economic health. Significant downward revisions suggest that job growth may be weaker than initially perceived, potentially influencing economic forecasts and policy decisions.

Key facts

  • The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) regularly revises its employment estimates.
  • Preliminary job gain estimates for May and June were substantially reduced.
  • The 2026 revisions indicate a downward adjustment of 0.1% of the total workforce.
  • Economists attribute slower hiring to business uncertainty related to tariff policy.
  • Declining response rates for BLS payroll surveys pose challenges to data accuracy.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) regularly releases employment data, with the monthly Employment Situation report being a key indicator of U.S. economic health. While preliminary estimates of job gains or losses are widely covered, the subsequent revisions are less frequently reported. Recent revisions for May and June showed significantly lower job gains than initially reported, with the May estimate falling 86% from preliminary to final. The July preliminary estimate indicated 73,000 jobs gained, but the 2026 revisions suggest a more modest downward adjustment of 0.1% of the total workforce, implying job growth is not as robust as initially presented.

These revisions are a normal part of the BLS process, designed to incorporate more complete data from voluntary payroll surveys of businesses. However, declining response rates for these surveys, falling below 50% since May 2021, present challenges to data accuracy. Despite these challenges, the average revision since 2023 has been a reduction of 32,000 jobs. The BLS uses confidence intervals to indicate the uncertainty in preliminary estimates; for July's 73,000 jobs gained, the 90% confidence interval was +/-136,000, suggesting the true number could range from 63,000 jobs lost to 209,000 jobs gained.

Economists have linked slower hiring to business uncertainty stemming from tariff policies. Following the release of the July jobs report, President Donald Trump claimed the numbers were 'rigged' and fired BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer, though he provided no evidence for his claim.

Frequently asked questions

The BLS revises job numbers to incorporate additional information that becomes available after the initial release, making the revised estimate more accurate.

It is not uncommon for preliminary estimates to be revised by up to 100,000 jobs in the final revision.

The confidence interval for preliminary estimates from the payroll surveys is +/-136,000 at a 90% confidence level, indicating the expected range for the actual number of jobs gained or lost.

What Happens Next

01Final revisions for June employment data are scheduled for release with the September 5 Employment Situation report.
CME Headlines
  • Global yields hit multi-year highs.
    1 Sep · 3:25 PM
  • Global yields hit multi-year highs.
    1 Sep · 3:25 PM
  • Global yields hit multi-year highs.
    1 Sep · 3:25 PM

How It Developed

The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) publishes preliminary estimates of job gains or losses monthly.
Revisions to preliminary estimates are a normal process for the BLS to improve accuracy.
The May and June preliminary job gain estimates were significantly revised downward.
The July preliminary estimate showed 73,000 jobs gained.
The 2026 revisions represent a downward adjustment of 0.1% of the total workforce.

Sources

T1
Smaller Revision Points to More Accurate Jobs NumbersThe New York Times
T2
Why are there revisions to the jobs numbers? : Beyond the Numbers : U.S. Bureau of Labor Statisticsbls.gov
T2
How and why the Bureau of Labor Statistics revises job numbersjournalistsresource.org

Related Stories

US job openings rise in July; hiring slows
1 Sep · 2:32 PM
US manufacturing activity slows in August; input prices still elevated
1 Sep · 2:04 PM
US Farmer Sentiment Surges Amidst Election Hopes and Economic Recovery
1 Sep · 2:36 PM
Manufacturing growth slows in August amid economic uncertainty
1 Sep · 10:45 AM
Bank of America's Level 2A HQLAs triple in Q2
1 Sep · 3:41 AM