Key facts
- Stablecoin remittances do not consistently offer a cost or speed advantage over traditional payment methods.
- Fiat conversion fees, foreign exchange spreads, and local banking charges constitute the majority of stablecoin remittance costs.
A Bank of Italy study found that while stablecoins can move value on-chain cheaply, the "last mile" conversion to local fiat currencies introduces significant costs and delays, negating consistent advantages over traditional remittance methods.

The findings challenge the common narrative that stablecoins are inherently cheaper for cross-border payments, highlighting that real-world usability and fiat conversion frictions remain significant hurdles to widespread adoption for remittances.
A study by the Bank of Italy has found that stablecoin-based remittances do not consistently offer a cost or speed advantage over traditional payment methods. Researchers tested 200 USDC remittances across 10 international payment corridors, with end-to-end costs ranging from 0.3% to nearly 9% of the transferred amount. While blockchain transaction fees were minimal, the bulk of expenses stemmed from converting fiat to stablecoins and back, foreign exchange spreads, and local banking charges. Settlement times also varied widely, from under 20 minutes with instant payment systems to up to two business days with conventional bank transfers. The study concluded that stablecoins effectively move value on-chain but have yet to overcome the costly "last mile" of converting to and from local fiat currencies. However, the Bank of Italy noted that stablecoins can reduce costs in specific corridors and offer advantages in always-on settlement and programmability.