HomeAll NewsEducationTV
Equities & FundsCrypto & Digital AssetsAI & TechnologyBusiness & CorporateUS Politics & PolicyGeopolitics & Global RiskMacro, Rates & FXCommodities & EnergyEuropean Politics & MarketsAsia-PacificReal Estate & Property
Story archiveAll categories
← All Stories

Homebuyers trapped in buyer representation agreements

Created at 22 Jul · 8:36 AM1 source↑ Market-relevant
IN SHORT

Prospective homebuyers are finding themselves locked into contracts with real estate agents, facing significant fees or difficulty terminating agreements even before seeing properties. This situation stems from new rules following a major 2024 legal settlement concerning agent commissions.

✉Newsletter

PiQ Daily

Pick your topics. Get only what matters, on your cadence.

Key Numbers

2024year of legal settlement
2023year of lawsuit against NAR
1 yearbinding period of agreement
$995flat fee commission

Who's Involved

Kirsten Ganas
homebuyer facing contract issues
Austin McCarley
homebuyer facing contract issues
Dan Waterhouse
real estate agent
Rita Sumney
head of real estate brokerage
Doug Miller
real estate lawyer
National Association of Realtors
industry trade group involved in settlement
Homebuyers trapped in buyer representation agreements

↳ Why This Matters

The new requirement for buyer representation agreements, stemming from a major legal settlement, is creating unintended consequences for homebuyers who may feel trapped in unfavorable contracts with real estate agents, potentially costing them thousands of dollars.

Key facts

  • Homebuyers Kirsten Ganas and Austin McCarley are facing difficulties terminating a buyer representation agreement with their real estate agent, Dan Waterhouse.
  • The agreement, signed before viewing properties, binds them to the brokerage for a year, with termination requiring fees or referral payments.
  • A 2024 legal settlement mandates written buyer-agent agreements before property tours, intended to increase consumer protection.
  • Consumer advocates express concern that these contracts could trap buyers with ineffective agents or high fees.
  • Historically, buyers' agents were often paid through seller commissions, making their services appear 'free' to buyers.

Homebuyers Kirsten Ganas and Austin McCarley found themselves in a difficult situation after signing a buyer representation agreement with their real estate agent, Dan Waterhouse, before viewing properties. The contract, which bound them to Waterhouse's brokerage for a year, stipulated that termination would incur fees or require finding another brokerage to pay a referral fee. Failure to comply meant owing the full agreed-upon commission, even if they bought a home without using an agent.

This situation highlights the impact of a significant 2024 legal settlement involving the National Association of Realtors, which now requires most agents to obtain written agreements with clients before showing them homes. While intended to enhance consumer protection by ensuring buyers understand their commitments, consumer advocates warn that this practice could inadvertently trap buyers with underperforming agents or excessive fees.

Historically, buyers' agents often advertised their services as free, with their compensation typically coming from a portion of the seller's commission. This model was upended by a class-action lawsuit that concluded in 2023, leading to the settlement and the new requirement for upfront written agreements.

Frequently asked questions

A buyer representation agreement is a contract outlining the terms of the relationship between a homebuyer and their real estate agent or brokerage.

A 2024 legal settlement mandated this change to ensure buyers understand their commitments to an agent or brokerage before touring properties.

Previously, agents often handed over formal documentation later in the process, and buyers' agents frequently advertised their services as 'free,' with commissions typically paid by the seller.

Consumer advocates worry that buyers might be bound to ineffective agents or agree to high fees before fully understanding the relationship, with termination often incurring costs.

What Happens Next

01The practice of springing buyer-broker agreements on consumers at the threshold is being criticized as unfair.
02Consumer advocates are monitoring the mixed results of the new contract requirements.
03The full impact of the 2024 settlement on buyer-agent relationships and fees is still unfolding.

Get the newsletter.

Pick the topics you actually care about. We'll email when there's news worth your time, on the cadence you choose. Cancel any time from your account.

Cadence

How It Developed

Kirsten Ganas and Austin McCarley encountered issues with their real estate agent, Dan Waterhouse.
Waterhouse had shown them approximately two dozen properties.
Ganas texted Waterhouse to inform him they were moving on after being outbid on a property.
They discovered they had signed a buyer representation agreement binding them to Waterhouse's brokerage for a year.
Rita Sumney, head of the brokerage, stated termination would require an early termination fee or a referral fee to another brokerage.
If they bought a home before the agreement ended, they would still owe the full commission.
A 2024 legal settlement mandated that agents get written agreements before showing homes to clients.
Consumer advocates warn that buyers may be tied to inept agents or excessive fees.

Sources

T1
She tried to fire her real estate agent. It turned into a nightmare.Business Insider

Related Stories

Investor home listings surge post-Housing Act, but national impact limited
21 Jul · 9:36 PM
FHA proposes new partial claim model eliminating subordinate liens
21 Jul · 9:26 PM
Student loan defaults rise, potentially softening Sun Belt housing demand
21 Jul · 1:21 PM
JMG Acquisition Signals New Leverage for Real Estate Teams
21 Jul · 9:36 PM
HomeAdvantage partners with Valley First on real estate rewards
21 Jul · 5:05 PM