All NewsEducationTV
Equities & FundsCrypto & Digital AssetsAI & TechnologyBusiness & CorporateUS Politics & PolicyGeopolitics & Global RiskMacro, Rates & FXCommodities & EnergyEuropean Politics & MarketsAsia-PacificReal Estate & Property
Story archiveAll categories
← All Stories

Congress probes private listing networks amid agent compensation debate

Created at 7 Aug · 6:46 PM1 source↑ Market-relevant
IN SHORT

US lawmakers are investigating real estate private listing networks, questioning if they insulate companies from competition and incentivize agents to steer sellers toward dual representation. Compass claims private listings earn sellers more, while Zillow research suggests the opposite, with lower-priced homes and those in communities of color losing value.

✉Newsletter

PiQ Daily

Pick your topics. Get only what matters, on your cadence.

Key Numbers

4.6%Compass's claimed premium for private listings
34%Compass's claimed increase in sales speed for private listings
70,809Compass's closed transactions studied
15 millionZillow's studied sales from 2023-2025
1.3%Zillow's estimated loss for off-MLS homes
$1.36 billionZillow's estimated total loss for sellers of off-MLS homes
2.2%Estimated loss for lower-priced homes off-MLS
1.9%Estimated loss for homes in communities of color off-MLS
1.1%Estimated loss for homes in majority-white neighborhoods off-MLS
$1.49 billionEstimated seller loss when one agent works both sides of a sale
1 million+Sales analyzed in Bright MLS and Drexel University study
17.5%Estimated premium for MLS-listed homes over off-MLS homes
$54,000Estimated additional amount for typical seller with MLS listing
August 5Deadline for Compass and MRED to brief House committee staff
August 21Deadline for Compass and MRED to respond to Senator Warren

Who's Involved

Robert Reffkin
CEO of Compass, received congressional inquiry
Rebecca Jensen
CEO of MRED, received congressional inquiry
Scott Fitzgerald
Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee's antitrust subcommittee
Elizabeth Warren
U.S. Senator investigating private listing networks
Dave Crosby
Chief Data Officer at Compass
Mischa Fisher
Chief Economist at Zillow
Darryl Davis
Real estate speaker, coach, and author
Congress probes private listing networks amid agent compensation debate

↳ Why This Matters

Congressional investigations into private listing networks could lead to new regulations impacting how real estate transactions are conducted, potentially affecting agent commissions, brokerage models, and consumer choice. The differing research findings highlight a conflict between brokerages seeking to keep deals in-house and platforms reliant on listing visibility, raising questions about trans

Key facts

  • US House Judiciary Committee and Senator Elizabeth Warren are investigating real estate private listing networks.
  • Compass claims its private listings result in 4.6% higher sale prices and 34% faster sales.
  • Zillow research suggests homes kept off the MLS sell for 1.3% less, with lower-priced homes and those in communities of color experiencing greater losses.
  • When one agent represents both sides of a transaction, sellers reportedly lose $1.49 billion.
  • Independent analysis indicates MLS-listed homes sell for approximately 17.5% more than comparable off-MLS homes.

The debate over off-MLS (Multiple Listing Service) private listing networks has reached Washington, with lawmakers scrutinizing the practice for potential anti-competitive behavior and consumer harm. The House Judiciary Committee's antitrust subcommittee and Senator Elizabeth Warren have sent letters to Compass CEO Robert Reffkin and MRED CEO Rebecca Jensen, seeking information on their private listing network partnership and its national expansion.

Lawmakers are concerned that these private arrangements may incentivize agents to steer sellers toward private listings, allowing brokerages to represent both sides of a transaction. This practice could lead to hidden inventory, weaker pricing data, fair housing risks, and market consolidation.

Compass argues that its private listings, marketed through phased strategies before appearing on the MLS, sell for 4.6% more and 34% faster than homes listed directly on the open market. This data is based on a study of over 70,000 of its own closed transactions.

Conversely, Zillow's research, analyzing over 15 million sales, found that homes kept off the MLS typically sold for 1.3% less, totaling an estimated $1.36 billion in lost value for sellers. This effect was more pronounced for lower-priced homes and homes in communities of color. Zillow also noted that when a single agent represented both parties in a sale, sellers lost an estimated $1.49 billion.

Independent analysis from Bright MLS and Drexel University, covering over a million sales, indicated that MLS-listed homes sold for approximately 17.5% more than comparable off-MLS homes. Experts suggest that the incentive structures for companies like Compass (building deals in-house) and Zillow (relying on listing visibility for advertising revenue) may influence their respective research findings.

Real estate agents are advised to clearly explain the differences between 'Coming Soon' statuses and permanently off-market listings, highlighting the potential trade-offs for sellers. Documenting seller decisions is emphasized as crucial, especially given congressional scrutiny into agent steering practices. The advice suggests agents should prioritize serving the seller's best interest over internal brokerage incentives.

Frequently asked questions

Lawmakers are concerned that private listing networks may insulate companies from competition and incentivize agents to steer sellers toward private listings, potentially leading to dual representation and reduced market exposure for sellers.

Compass claims that homes marketed through its private listing strategies sell for 4.6% more and 34% faster than homes listed directly on the MLS.

Zillow found that homes kept off the MLS typically sold for 1.3% less, with lower-priced homes and those in communities of color experiencing greater value loss.

Agents are advised to clearly explain the tradeoffs between private and MLS listings, document seller decisions, and ensure they are serving the seller's best interest over brokerage incentives.

What Happens Next

01Compass and MRED must respond to inquiries from the House Judiciary Committee by August 5.
02Compass and MRED must respond to Senator Warren's inquiries by August 21.

Get the newsletter.

Pick the topics you actually care about. We'll email when there's news worth your time, on the cadence you choose. Cancel any time from your account.

Cadence

How It Developed

House Judiciary Committee sent letters to Compass and MRED regarding private listing networks.
Senator Elizabeth Warren sent similar letters to Compass and MRED.
Compass claims its private listings yield higher sale prices and faster sales.
Zillow research indicates homes kept off the MLS sell for less, particularly lower-priced homes and those in communities of color.
Zillow also found sellers lost money when one agent worked both sides of a sale.
Independent research shows MLS-listed homes sell for significantly more than off-MLS homes.
The debate centers on agent incentives and potential steering for brokerage benefit.
Agents are advised to clearly explain the tradeoffs of private vs. MLS listings and document seller decisions.

Sources

T1
The off-MLS debate moves to Washington, and agents need a clear scriptHousingWire

Related Stories

Sen. Warren questions Compass, MRED private listing network deal
7 Aug · 3:31 PM
Gibson lawsuit plaintiffs authorized to notify MLSs of settlement data duties
7 Aug · 6:35 PM
Data centers are increasingly competing for land, potentially limiting housing supply
6 Aug · 9:21 PM
Millrose Properties Q2 2026 Earnings Show Growth Amid Housing Market Challenges
7 Aug · 5:41 PM
REMAX, Keller Williams win final approval of homebuyer commission settlement
7 Aug · 7:10 PM