Key facts
- Former Ukrainian Defense Minister Mykhailo Fedorov submitted requests for EU loan funds to acquire anti-ballistic missiles.
- The requests include U.S.-made PAC-3 missiles, which Ukraine critically needs.
- Fedorov's actions occurred just before his controversial dismissal on July 15.
- The EU has a 90-billion-euro loan facility for defense support to Ukraine.
- Ukraine is seeking derogations to use EU funds for non-European military equipment.
Former Ukrainian Defense Minister Mykhailo Fedorov took steps to secure billions in EU loan funds for anti-ballistic missile technology, including U.S.-made PAC-3 missiles, shortly before his dismissal. Fedorov, who was removed from his post by President Volodymyr Zelensky on July 15, stated he had applied for PAC-3 missiles through an EU loan mechanism. Ukraine is facing a severe shortage of these missiles, which are crucial for intercepting Russian ballistic missiles targeting civilian areas.
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen announced defense support for Ukraine during a visit on July 15. While some of this support includes "medium and long-range deep strike missiles," the PAC-3 missiles are specifically anti-ballistic and not European-made. To procure them using the EU's 90-billion-euro ($103 billion) loan facility, Ukraine needs to specifically request them and seek exemptions for non-EU sourcing.
EU officials confirmed to The Kyiv Independent that Fedorov submitted additional product schedules, formal shopping lists for weapons, before his departure. These schedules reportedly contain a mix of European products and requests for derogations. Bundling requests for both European and U.S. air defense systems could potentially ease concerns among European capitals about their own defense industry benefiting from the loan. Nine EU countries have previously expressed support for Ukraine using EU funds to acquire U.S. weaponry.
However, Fedorov's dismissal, described as controversial, could complicate the approval process. EU Defense Commissioner Andrius Kubilius had previously indicated that such a replacement might raise questions about the underlying reasons, suggesting Fedorov's exit "could weigh on the whole thing."