All NewsEducationTV
Equities & FundsCrypto & Digital AssetsAI & TechnologyBusiness & CorporateUS Politics & PolicyGeopolitics & Global RiskMacro, Rates & FXCommodities & EnergyEuropean Politics & MarketsAsia-PacificReal Estate & Property
Story archiveAll categories
← All Stories

UK retailers push back against Chancellor's profiteering threats

Created at 3 Aug · 11:06 AM1 source↑ Market-relevant
IN SHORT

UK retailers have responded to Chancellor John Healey's warnings against price gouging amid the Iran war, asserting that intense competition keeps food prices low. The British Retail Consortium stated that the industry operates on thin margins and that government actions, not retailer greed, contribute to costs.

✉Newsletter

PiQ Daily

Pick your topics. Get only what matters, on your cadence.

Key Numbers

1.7%food inflation in June

Who's Involved

John Healey
UK Chancellor warning against profiteering
Rachel Reeves
Predecessor to Healey, previously suggested price-gouging
Jim Bligh
BRC corporate affairs director
Andrew Opie
BRC director of food
Stuart Machin
CEO of Marks & Spencer
British Retail Consortium
Trade body representing UK retailers
Competition and Markets Authority
UK competition watchdog
UK retailers push back against Chancellor's profiteering threats

↳ Why This Matters

The exchange highlights the ongoing tension between the government's efforts to control inflation and protect consumers, and the retail industry's defense of its pricing practices and its own operational challenges.

Key facts

  • Retailers have pushed back against Chancellor John Healey's warnings of cracking down on "price gouging" during the Iran war.
  • The British Retail Consortium (BRC) stated that the UK retail sector has low profit margins and that competition keeps food prices down.
  • BRC cited multiple reports from the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) that found no evidence of profiteering by British grocers.
  • The BRC argued that government policies, including National Insurance contributions and packaging taxes, contribute to retailer costs.
  • Food inflation has recently fallen to 1.7% despite fears of price surges due to the Iran war.

Retailers have responded to Chancellor John Healey's warnings against price gouging amid the ongoing Iran war, asserting that intense competition within the sector is what keeps food prices as low as possible. Healey had stated that the Treasury is prepared to take action against any retailers using the conflict as a pretext to increase prices.

The British Retail Consortium (BRC), representing major UK retailers like Sainsbury's, Tesco, and Asda, has pushed back against the Chancellor's rhetoric. Jim Bligh, the BRC's corporate affairs director, told City AM that labeling retailers as potential profiteers is unhelpful, given that the industry operates on some of the UK's lowest margins. He emphasized that competition is actively suppressing food price inflation, and suggested that government support for the industry on this front has been lacking.

Bligh warned that Healey's threats could provoke an industry backlash, and that retailers would continue to demonstrate the strength of competition to the CMA to prove there is no profiteering. Andrew Opie, the BRC's director of food, pointed to three consecutive reports by the CMA that found no evidence of profiteering among British grocers. Opie also noted that many additional costs facing retailers have been imposed by the government, citing higher National Insurance contributions, increased packaging taxes, and the failure to reform business rates.

Food inflation has recently fallen to 1.7% in June, despite concerns that the Iran war would lead to a surge in supermarket prices. Healey himself had written in the Sunday Telegraph that while companies have worked positively with the government during the crisis and there has been no significant evidence of price gouging, regulators have the power to clamp down if it occurs. This follows similar suggestions from Healey's predecessor, Rachel Reeves, which were met with strong criticism from industry leaders.

Frequently asked questions

Chancellor John Healey is concerned that retailers might be using the Iran war as an excuse to increase prices and profit from consumers.

The BRC argues that retailers operate on low margins, that competition keeps prices down, and that government policies contribute to costs, refuting claims of profiteering.

Retailers point to multiple reports from the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) that have found no evidence of profiteering among British grocers.

Retailers mention government-imposed costs such as higher National Insurance contributions, packaging taxes, and the outdated business rates system.

What Happens Next

01The BRC will continue to demonstrate the strength of competition to the CMA.
02Regulators will monitor for any evidence of price gouging.

Get the newsletter.

Pick the topics you actually care about. We'll email when there's news worth your time, on the cadence you choose. Cancel any time from your account.

Cadence

How It Developed

Chancellor John Healey warned retailers against profiteering from the Iran war.
The British Retail Consortium (BRC) stated that supermarkets are not profiteering.
BRC stated that competition keeps food prices low and criticized government inaction on food inflation.
BRC noted that government policies, such as National Insurance contributions and packaging taxes, increase retailer costs.
BRC cited three Competition and Markets Authority reports finding no evidence of grocer profiteering.

Sources

T1
Retailers hit back at Healey’s ‘profiteering’ threatCity AM

Related Stories

France tightens foreign investment checks to 10% threshold
3 Aug · 10:46 AM
UEFA threatens legal action against FIFA President Infantino, Joshua Kushner
3 Aug · 9:41 AM
Europe's workers face encroaching work hours, impacting personal time
3 Aug · 5:21 AM