HomeEverythingEducationTV
Equities & FundsCrypto & Digital AssetsAI & TechnologyBusiness & CorporateUS Politics & PolicyGeopolitics & Global RiskMacro, Rates & FXCommodities & EnergyEuropean Politics & MarketsAsia-PacificReal Estate & Property
Story archiveAll categories
← All Stories

AI-driven fraud requires traditional financial controls for crypto advisors

Created at 16 Jul · 3:06 PM1 source↑ Market-relevant
IN SHORT

As AI lowers the cost of sophisticated impersonation scams, financial advisors must rely on established controls like dual authorization, out-of-band verification, and independent reconciliation to protect client assets in the digital asset space.

✉Newsletter

PiQ Daily

Pick your topics. Get only what matters, on your cadence.

Key Numbers

$20.9 billionFBI reported cybercrime losses in 2025
$17 billionEstimated crypto scam flows in 2025
4.5 timesProfitability of AI-assisted crypto scams
$2,764Average crypto scam payment in 2025
1,400%Increase in impersonation scams recorded by Chainalysis

Who's Involved

Kriti Bansal
Vice President Finance and Accounting at AlphaPoint, author on AI fraud defenses
Varun Choudhary
CEO of ORO, expert on automating fraud defenses with smart accounts
FBI
U.S. law enforcement agency reporting on cybercrime losses
Chainalysis
Blockchain analysis firm providing data on crypto scams
AI-driven fraud requires traditional financial controls for crypto advisors

↳ Why This Matters

The increasing sophistication of AI-driven fraud poses a significant threat to client assets managed by financial advisors, necessitating a return to and reinforcement of fundamental financial controls to maintain security and uphold fiduciary duties in the digital asset space.

Key facts

  • AI has made crypto fraud cheaper, more personalized, and more convincing, particularly through impersonation.
  • The FBI reported $20.9 billion in cybercrime losses in 2025, with crypto being a frequent payment method.
  • Chainalysis found AI-powered crypto scams were 4.5 times more profitable than those without.
  • Traditional financial controls like dual authorization, out-of-band verification, and independent reconciliation are essential defenses.
  • Programmable smart accounts and automated monitoring can create programmatic security guardrails.

Artificial intelligence is transforming the landscape of financial fraud, making impersonation tactics cheaper and more convincing, according to a recent analysis for financial advisors.

The FBI's Internet Crime Complaint Center reported a record $20.9 billion in cybercrime losses in 2025, with cryptocurrency being the most common payment channel. Chainalysis estimates that approximately $17 billion flowed to crypto scams during the same period, noting that operations leveraging AI tools were roughly 4.5 times more profitable than those without. The average payment in crypto scams more than tripled year-over-year to $2,764.

Instead of focusing solely on detecting sophisticated AI-generated fakes, advisors are urged to reinforce traditional financial controls. These include dual authorization for all asset movements, requiring two independent approvers to prevent a single impersonated individual from authorizing transactions. Out-of-band verification, confirming instructions through a separate, pre-agreed channel, is also critical, especially when faced with urgent requests.

Independent reconciliation of client holdings against verifiable on-chain data, performed by someone not involved in initiating transactions, is another key control. Advisors should also conduct thorough due diligence on custodians, reviewing their SOC reports and asset-segregation practices. The digital-asset accounting standard ASU 2023-08 provides further disclosure opportunities for verification.

Experts suggest that AI has not introduced entirely new fraud categories but has significantly reduced the cost of executing existing ones. This shift places a greater emphasis on robust, verified processes. For money managers, transitioning to programmable smart accounts, such as those compliant with ERC-4337 or EIP-7702, can enable automated security guardrails at the account level, including continuous monitoring for suspicious activity and blocking risky approvals before funds can be moved. While AI can assist advisors by flagging unusual behavior, granting it direct, unmitigated wallet permissions is seen as a major vulnerability.

Frequently asked questions

Yes, AI can support advisors by flagging unusual wallet behavior, suspicious contracts, and risky approvals. However, AI should not act as an autonomous decision-maker, and granting it direct, unmitigated wallet permission can create a significant attack vector.

In the age of AI, real-time security needs to be predictive and proactive, not reactive. This includes warnings before signing transactions, continuous wallet monitoring, instant alerts on abnormal activity, and blocking risky approvals before funds can move.

Money managers can automate defenses by transitioning from legacy externally owned wallets to programmable smart accounts. This allows for automated, programmatic security guardrails at the account level, including monitoring wallets, approvals, contract risks, and transaction patterns, with human escalation for unusual events.

What Happens Next

01Advisors should implement dual authorization for all client asset movements.
02Advisors should establish out-of-band verification protocols for fund transfer instructions.
03Money managers should explore programmable smart accounts for automated security guardrails.

Get the newsletter.

Pick the topics you actually care about. We'll email when there's news worth your time, on the cadence you choose. Cancel any time from your account.

Cadence

How It Developed

AI has significantly lowered the cost and increased the sophistication of fraud, making impersonation tactics more convincing.
The FBI reported record cybercrime losses in 2025, with cryptocurrency being a common payment channel.
Chainalysis estimates that $17 billion flowed to crypto scams in 2025, with AI-assisted operations being more profitable.
The average crypto scam payment more than tripled year-over-year to $2,764.
Advisors are advised to focus on financial controls rather than solely on detecting deepfakes.
Key controls include dual authorization for asset movement, out-of-band verification for instructions, and independent reconciliation against blockchain data.
Due diligence on custodians, including SOC reports and proof of reserves, is crucial.
Programmable smart accounts and automated monitoring can enhance real-time security.

Sources

T1
Crypto for Advisors: Strengthening defenses against AI fraudCoinDesk

Related Stories

Ledger enables AI agents to manage crypto without holding private keys
16 Jul · 1:06 PM
FATF urges faster crypto AML enforcement as stablecoin crime increases
16 Jul · 12:16 PM
ARK Invest disputes a16z crypto's 'TradFi wants blockchain, not DeFi' thesis
16 Jul · 11:41 AM
EU Crypto Firms Gain Users as MiCA Regulation Takes Full Effect
16 Jul · 10:06 AM
Ault Blockchain Develops Layer-1 Network Amid Banking Risks
16 Jul · 10:00 AM