HomeAll NewsEducationTV
Equities & FundsCrypto & Digital AssetsAI & TechnologyBusiness & CorporateUS Politics & PolicyGeopolitics & Global RiskMacro, Rates & FXCommodities & EnergyEuropean Politics & MarketsAsia-PacificReal Estate & Property
Story archiveAll categories
← All Stories

Domino's Australia Considers Appeal After Court Ruling on Enterprise Agreements

Created at 23 Jul · 2:52 AM1 source↑ Market-relevant
IN SHORT

Domino's Pizza Enterprises is evaluating appeal options following a Federal Court ruling that found the company made misleading representations regarding the application of certain enterprise agreements to its employees.

✉Newsletter

PiQ Daily

Pick your topics. Get only what matters, on your cadence.

Key Numbers

A$11,869former worker's assessed loss
1.4255Australian dollars to US dollar exchange rate
June 2013 and January 2018period of alleged underpayment

Who's Involved

Domino's Pizza Enterprises
Australian company facing a class action lawsuit
Federal Court
Court that ruled against Domino's
Fast Food Industry Award 2010
Award workers claimed should have applied

↳ Why This Matters

The ruling highlights potential risks for companies regarding the accurate application of labor agreements and could lead to significant financial implications if Domino's wider exposure is substantial.

Key facts

  • Domino's Pizza Enterprises is considering an appeal after a Federal Court ruling.
  • The court found the company made misleading representations about enterprise agreements.
  • The coverage clause in a 2005 enterprise agreement was deemed invalid.
  • Workers claimed they should have been paid under the Fast Food Industry Award 2010.
  • A former worker was awarded approximately A$11,869 plus interest for underpayment.
  • Domino's stated its potential financial exposure to other group members is uncertain.

Domino's Pizza Enterprises is contemplating an appeal following a Federal Court decision that found the company engaged in misleading representations concerning the application of certain enterprise agreements to its employees. The proceeding was initiated by a former worker on behalf of a group of Domino's franchisee employees, including delivery drivers and in-store staff, who worked between June 2013 and January 2018.

The court determined that Domino's historical statements about the application of specific enterprise agreements were misleading, invalidating the coverage clause within a 2005 enterprise agreement. The workers had argued that they should have been compensated under the Fast Food Industry Award 2010, rather than the enterprise agreements Domino's had applied across its corporate and franchised stores.

In assessing the former worker's claim, the court calculated a loss of approximately A$11,869, plus interest, concluding that Domino's conduct resulted in the worker suffering financial loss due to underpayment. Domino's has indicated that its potential broader financial exposure to other members of the alleged group remains highly uncertain and unquantifiable, and the company is currently evaluating possible grounds for an appeal.

Frequently asked questions

The lawsuit alleged that Domino's made misleading representations about the application of certain enterprise agreements to its delivery drivers and in-store workers, who claimed they should have been paid under the Fast Food Industry Award 2010.

The Federal Court found Domino's representations misleading and ruled that the coverage clause in a 2005 enterprise agreement was invalid.

The court assessed the former worker's loss at approximately A$11,869, plus interest, due to underpayment.

Domino's Pizza Enterprises is considering its options for an appeal and is assessing its potential wider financial exposure.

What Happens Next

01Domino's will assess possible grounds for appeal.
02The company will evaluate its potential wider financial exposure.

Get the newsletter.

Pick the topics you actually care about. We'll email when there's news worth your time, on the cadence you choose. Cancel any time from your account.

Cadence

How It Developed

A former Domino's worker initiated a class action lawsuit on behalf of franchisee employees.
The Federal Court ruled Domino's made misleading representations about enterprise agreement applications.
The court found the coverage clause in a 2005 enterprise agreement invalid.
Workers alleged they should have been paid under the Fast Food Industry Award 2010.
The court assessed the former worker's loss at approximately A$11,869 plus interest.
Domino's stated its potential wider exposure is uncertain and unquantifiable.
Domino's is considering grounds for an appeal.
Sponsored

London Quick Take - 22 July - UK inflation softens, oil rises and chips rally ahead of Alphabet, Tesla earnings

SAXO

Sources

T1
Australia's Domino's Pizza considering appeal options after class action court rulingReuters

Related Stories

Amazon reaches workers' rights deal with Italian unions
22 Jul · 3:22 PM
Macquarie CEO Shemara Wikramanayake to retire Nov. 6; Greg Ward named successor
22 Jul · 11:06 PM
Randstad executives see early signs of hiring demand improvement
22 Jul · 9:39 AM
Target Appoints Former 7-Eleven CEO DePinto to Board
22 Jul · 10:35 AM
Nestle nears sale of European water business stake to Platinum Equity
22 Jul · 1:53 PM