HomeEverything
Equities & FundsCrypto & Digital AssetsAI & TechnologyBusiness & CorporateUS Politics & PolicyGeopolitics & Global RiskMacro, Rates & FXCommodities & EnergyEuropean Politics & MarketsAsia-PacificReal Estate & Property
← All Stories

Midjourney seeks studio AI usage details in copyright dispute

Created at 4 Jul · 6:35 PM1 source↑ Market-relevant
IN SHORT

AI startup Midjourney is asking a judge to compel Hollywood studios Disney, Universal, and Warner Bros. to reveal their own internal use of generative AI tools as part of an ongoing copyright infringement lawsuit.

✉Newsletter

PiQ Daily

Pick your topics. Get only what matters, on your cadence.

Who's Involved

Midjourney
AI startup facing copyright infringement lawsuits
Disney
Hollywood studio suing Midjourney for copyright infringement
Universal
Hollywood studio suing Midjourney for copyright infringement
Warner Bros.
Hollywood studio suing Midjourney for copyright infringement
David Singer
Lead attorney for the Hollywood studios
Midjourney seeks studio AI usage details in copyright dispute

↳ Why This Matters

This legal battle highlights the complex intersection of AI development, copyright law, and industry practices, potentially setting precedents for how generative AI can be trained and used, and whether companies can claim fair use while also pursuing legal action against AI developers.

Key facts

  • Midjourney is involved in a legal dispute with Hollywood studios Disney, Universal, and Warner Bros. over alleged copyright infringement.
  • The studios claim Midjourney's AI models create images of their copyrighted characters without authorization.
  • Midjourney argues that training its AI on copyrighted material is permissible under fair use.
  • Midjourney is seeking to expand the scope of discovery to include studios' internal and 'consumer-facing' AI usage.
  • The AI startup contends that studios' internal AI development practices could support its defense and demonstrate industry custom.

AI image generation company Midjourney is pushing back against Hollywood studios in an ongoing copyright dispute, seeking to uncover how the studios themselves utilize artificial intelligence technologies. Disney, Universal, and Warner Bros. have each sued Midjourney, alleging that the company's AI models infringe on their copyrights by generating images of famous characters like Bart Simpson and Darth Vader.

Midjourney maintains that its use of copyrighted material for training its AI models falls under fair use. The current legal battle centers on the documentation studios must provide during the discovery phase. A previous ruling limited this disclosure to AI usage that resulted in "consumer-facing" videos and images.

In its latest legal filing, Midjourney aims to overturn this restriction, arguing it unfairly disadvantages its defense by allowing studios to selectively provide information. The startup contends that studios are withholding documents that could reveal their own internal practices of training AI on unlicensed copyrighted content, which Midjourney believes would demonstrate an industry-wide custom.

Furthermore, Midjourney is requesting that the studios disclose all prompts and resulting outputs used in their AI development, not solely those associated with the allegedly infringing images. The studios' lead attorney, David Singer, has characterized Midjourney's requests as a "fishing expedition," asserting that the studios aim to prevent unauthorized copying of their characters rather than halt AI technology itself.

Frequently asked questions

The studios accuse Midjourney of copyright infringement for using their characters to train its AI models. Midjourney argues this training is permissible under fair use.

Midjourney wants the studios to reveal details about their own internal and consumer-facing use of generative AI, including prompts and outputs, not just those related to alleged infringement.

Midjourney believes this information will support its defense by showing that using unlicensed copyrighted content for AI training is an industry custom, even among the studios themselves.

What Happens Next

01A judge will rule on Midjourney's request to expand the scope of discovery.
02Studios may be compelled to reveal more details about their internal AI usage.

Get the newsletter.

Pick the topics you actually care about. We'll email when there's news worth your time, on the cadence you choose. Cancel any time from your account.

Cadence

How It Developed

Disney and Universal sued Midjourney for alleged copyright infringement.
Warner Bros. also sued Midjourney for copyright infringement.
A judge ruled studios must provide information on generative AI usage leading to consumer-facing content.
Midjourney is seeking to overturn the limitation on discovery, arguing it unfairly restricts its defense.
Midjourney claims studios are withholding documents that would show industry custom of training AI on unlicensed content.
Midjourney also wants studios to reveal all prompts and outputs, not just those related to alleged infringement.

Sources

T1
Midjourney wants Hollywood studios to reveal the details of their AI usageTechCrunch

Related Stories

AI security concerns cast shadow over NATO summit
4 Jul · 8:05 PM
Mistral AI: French AI firm's strategy, funding, and models explained
4 Jul · 4:05 PM
ByteDance discovers AI scaling law potentially aiding industry growth
3 Jul · 10:05 PM
OpenAI's Stargate UK Project Faces Scrutiny Over Site Visits and Hypothetical Investment
4 Jul · 12:05 PM
Perplexity Co-Founder: AI Safety Narrative Used to Consolidate Power
4 Jul · 4:10 PM