All NewsEducationTV
Equities & FundsCrypto & Digital AssetsAI & TechnologyBusiness & CorporateUS Politics & PolicyGeopolitics & Global RiskMacro, Rates & FXCommodities & EnergyEuropean Politics & MarketsAsia-PacificReal Estate & Property
Story archiveAll categories
← All Stories

AI firms bulk buy rare books, sparking fears of destructive scanning

Created at 12 Aug · 3:26 PM1 source↑ Market-relevant
IN SHORT

AI companies are reportedly buying rare books in bulk, raising concerns among booksellers and preservationists about destructive scanning methods that could lead to the permanent loss of physical copies. While some firms deny destroying rare books, the practice highlights a tension between rapid AI development and cultural preservation.

✉Newsletter

PiQ Daily

Pick your topics. Get only what matters, on your cadence.

Key Numbers

2009year Google patented non-destructive book-scanning
2025summer lawsuit outing Anthropic's book destruction
1.5 millionviews on a video of Internet Archive's scanning process
3 millionpages scanned by Eliza Zhang
14,000foldouts scanned by Eliza Zhang
18,000items scanned by Eliza Zhang
5,000obscure titles in a suspicious order flagged by an Irish bookstore

Who's Involved

Eliza Zhang
book scanner at the Internet Archive
Andrea Mills
leader of the Internet Archive's book-scanning operations
Chris Freeland
director of library services at the Internet Archive
Anthropic
AI firm accused of destroying books for training
OpenAI
AI company working with Harvard on book digitization
Microsoft
company working with Harvard on book digitization
xAI
Elon Musk's AI company, stated it won't destroy rare books
ISBNdb
book-database company advertising sourcing for AI firms
AI firms bulk buy rare books, sparking fears of destructive scanning

↳ Why This Matters

The practice of AI firms acquiring and potentially destroying rare books raises critical questions about the balance between technological advancement and the preservation of cultural heritage, with significant implications for libraries, collectors, and the long-term availability of historical texts.

Key facts

  • AI firms are reportedly purchasing rare books in large quantities.
  • Concerns exist that these books may be destroyed through destructive scanning methods for AI training.
  • Google patented a non-destructive book-scanning technology in 2009.
  • The Internet Archive employs a careful, manual scanning process to preserve rare books.
  • Anthropic was previously identified as destroying print books for AI training.
  • Some AI companies, like OpenAI and Microsoft, are working on preservation initiatives.
  • Rare booksellers are identifying suspicious bulk orders as a potential indicator of AI sourcing.

AI companies are reportedly engaging in the bulk purchase of rare books, sparking significant concern among booksellers and preservationists about the potential destruction of these valuable cultural artifacts for AI training purposes. While the cheapest and fastest method for AI firms involves physically destroying books to scan them, alternative, non-destructive methods exist, such as a technology patented by Google in 2009 and the meticulous manual process employed by the Internet Archive.

The Internet Archive, through scanners like Eliza Zhang, emphasizes a careful, page-by-page approach to digitize even the most fragile rare books, ensuring their preservation. This contrasts sharply with the aggressive, cost-driven methods that some AI companies are rumored to be using. A lawsuit in summer 2025 highlighted Anthropic's alleged destruction of millions of print books, operating under a codename 'Project Panama' to conceal the practice.

While some AI firms, including OpenAI and Microsoft in partnership with Harvard, are involved in preserving public-domain books, and Elon Musk's xAI has publicly committed to non-destructive scanning, skepticism remains. Critics point to the ambiguity in defining 'rare' books and the potential for companies to still destroy copies they own, even if they claim to preserve originals. Meanwhile, booksellers are increasingly flagging unusual bulk orders, recognizing them as potential indicators of AI firms seeking to acquire large volumes of texts, sometimes without price negotiation, which has become a red flag for the industry.

Frequently asked questions

AI companies are reportedly buying books in bulk to train their large language models, seeking high-quality, long-form texts to improve model performance.

The primary concern is that AI firms may be destroying physical copies of books, including rare and irreplaceable ones, through destructive scanning methods to accelerate their training processes.

Yes, Google patented a non-destructive scanning technology in 2009, and the Internet Archive uses a meticulous manual process that preserves the integrity of the books.

Anthropic has been accused of destroying millions of print books. Other firms like OpenAI, Microsoft, and xAI have made statements regarding their approaches to book scanning and preservation.

What Happens Next

01Further scrutiny of AI firms' book acquisition and scanning practices is expected.
02Booksellers may implement stricter vetting processes for bulk orders.
03Discussions on AI ethics and the preservation of physical media are likely to intensify.

Get the newsletter.

Pick the topics you actually care about. We'll email when there's news worth your time, on the cadence you choose. Cancel any time from your account.

Cadence

How It Developed

AI firms are reportedly bulk buying rare books, raising concerns among booksellers.
Concerns stem from the practice of destroying books to train AI models.
Google patented a non-destructive book-scanning technology in 2009.
The Internet Archive uses a meticulous, non-destructive manual scanning process for rare books.
A lawsuit in summer 2025 outed Anthropic for destroying millions of print books to train AI.
Reports indicate AI companies are endangering rare books through destructive scanning.
ISBNdb advertised its ability to help AI firms source books in bulk.
Anthropic used a codename, 'Project Panama,' for its destructive book-scanning.

Sources

T1
Here’s a balm if the idea of destroying books to train AI breaks your heartvar abtest_2167153 = new ABTest(2167153, 'impression');Ars Technica

Related Stories

Researchers use AI to find Zoom screen sharing vulnerabilities
12 Aug · 1:46 PM
Tech innovator uses AI to rebuild David Webb’s Hong Kong database
12 Aug · 11:36 AM
Chinese AI start-up ModelBest begins pre-IPO tutoring for mainland listing
12 Aug · 7:31 AM
AI Enhances Homebuilder Land Acquisition Teams
12 Aug · 10:21 AM
Real estate leaders weigh buying vs. building AI tools
11 Aug · 7:46 PM